Skip to main content

Security report for lecab.com

LECAB Materialhantering AB · Manufacturing · Sweden

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LECAB Materialhantering AB is a Swedish company specializing in customized material handling solutions, offering end-to-end services from needs analysis and design to manufacturing, installation, and project management. With origins dating back to the 1940s under Levander & Co AB, Lecab has established itself as a trusted provider in the manufacturing and transportation sectors, serving industrial clients seeking efficient and tailored material handling systems. The company emphasizes being a single point of contact for clients, ensuring seamless project execution and after-sales support. Technically, the website is built on the Webflow platform, leveraging modern JavaScript frameworks and 3D visualization tools, delivering a fast and mobile-optimized user experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS, employs cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR, and shows no signs of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure information, which are areas for improvement. Overall, Lecab's digital presence reflects a professional and credible business with strong trust indicators and a solid technical foundation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lecab.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LECAB operates in the manufacturing and transportation sectors, focusing on B2B sales of material handling equipment and systems. Their competitive advantage lies in decades of industry experience, comprehensive service offerings, and certifications such as ISO 9001 and ISO 14001. The business model revolves around customized solutions tailored to client needs, ranging from individual components to complete system integrations. Lecab targets industrial companies requiring optimized material flow and automation. The website content and structure indicate a medium-sized enterprise with a consistent brand and clear market positioning. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and trust signals, supporting business growth and customer confidence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content or scripts. The use of reputable third-party services like Google Tag Manager and Analytics is transparent and managed via consent. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a security.txt file or incident response contact information represent gaps in the security framework. These omissions could hinder rapid vulnerability reporting and incident management. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional best practices and formal policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting risks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosures and improve transparency.
  3. Add an incident response contact email (e.g., security@lecab.com) on the website.
  4. Develop and publish a terms of service page to clarify user and business obligations.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LECAB Materialhantering AB
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LECAB Materialhantering AB
Description
LECAB Materialhantering offers customized material handling solutions including needs analysis, design, manufacturing, installation, and project management. They serve as a single point of contact for optimizing material handling processes.
Key services
Material handling system design, Project management, Manufacturing and installation, Aftermarket support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Finsweet components, jQuery 3.5.1, Spline 3D scenes, JavaScript ES6 modules
Frameworks
Webflow CMS
Platforms
Webflow hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured
  2. Content is primarily in Swedish with some English meta tags
  3. Clear business focus on material handling solutions
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR compliant
  5. Contact information is complete and prominently displayed
  6. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity
  7. Use of modern web technologies and frameworks
  8. No terms of service or explicit security policy pages found
  9. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries including Finsweet components and Spline for 3D interactive content. It uses Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes, integrated with a GDPR-compliant cookie consent banner. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, ensuring fast load times and good performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and uses Google Fonts for typography. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected. The technical implementation is modern and well-maintained, supporting a positive user experience and efficient content delivery. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and accessibility compliance to further strengthen the technical posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lecab.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lecab.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.