Skip to main content

Security report for leadcom-is.com

Leadcom · Telecommunications · Israel

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Leadcom Integrated Solutions (L.I.S.) Ltd., a Tech Mahindra company, is a medium-sized international telecommunications network deployment and solutions provider with a strong presence across Africa. The company offers a comprehensive portfolio of services including telecom infrastructure solutions, tower portfolio management, coverage enhancement, energy efficiency, site security, and network services. Their business model focuses on serving telecom operators, TowerCos, OEMs, and governmental/private enterprises with a professional and efficient network and operations platform. The website reflects a consistent and professional brand image with clear service offerings and geographic presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching leadcom-is.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
70
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Leadcom holds a strong market position as a preferred partner for telecom infrastructure projects in Africa, leveraging long-term customer relationships and a pan-African network of offices. The company benefits from its association with Tech Mahindra, enhancing credibility and operational capacity. Their business model emphasizes turnkey rollout, network maintenance, and energy-efficient solutions, targeting telecom operators and related enterprises. The company’s digital presence is supported by modern CMS and SEO tools, though lacks comprehensive privacy and security disclosures. The partnership ecosystem includes Tech Mahindra as parent and Wisite as website developer.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate security posture with implementation of several security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. However, the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate and lack of HTTPS severely undermine the security stance, exposing users to potential interception risks. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, and no advanced security mechanisms like OCSP stapling or session resumption are enabled. The site uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms, which is a positive security control. Overall, the security maturity is low due to critical SSL absence.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and protect user data.
  2. Implement and display comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Add vulnerability disclosure and incident response information to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Enable advanced SSL features such as OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve security and performance.
  5. Regularly audit security headers and update configurations to align with best practices.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Leadcom Integrated Solutions (L.I.S.) Ltd.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress using Elementor page builder and several plugins including Yoast SEO, Jet Elements, and Bellows Accordion Menu. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes, and uses Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form protection. The site is hosted on a Plesk-based environment. While the site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, performance data is unavailable. The lack of SSL and modern TLS protocols is a significant technical risk. The site structure and metadata are well implemented, including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data for SEO and social sharing.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with leadcom-is.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review leadcom-is.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.