Skip to main content

Security report for ldstudio.cz

LD Studio · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LD Studio is a Czech Republic-based small technology service provider specializing in custom web development, e-commerce solutions, graphic design, and complementary digital marketing and printing services. The company positions itself as a partner offering personalized and modern digital solutions primarily targeting businesses and individuals seeking professional web and graphic design services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and client testimonials, indicating a trustworthy and established presence in its regional market. Technically, the website employs a moderate technology stack including jQuery, Swiper.js, and ASP.NET Web Forms, with Google Analytics integrated under privacy-conscious settings. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit privacy and terms of service pages, which are areas for improvement. Performance is moderate, and SEO practices appear adequate. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and minimal exposure of sensitive data but would benefit from enhanced security headers and more transparent privacy policies. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, though the website content and contact details suggest legitimate business operations. No critical vulnerabilities or adult content were detected, and the site is fully accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms. Overall, LD Studio presents a credible and professional digital agency with room for improvement in security and compliance transparency. Strategic enhancements in privacy documentation and security headers would strengthen its security posture and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ldstudio.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LD Studio operates in the technology sector as a small-sized digital agency focused on web and graphic design services. Its market positioning leverages personalized client engagement and modern design approaches, supported by a portfolio of client testimonials and partnerships with recognized organizations. The business model centers on service delivery with offerings spanning graphic design, custom web and e-commerce development, application programming, printing, and supplementary marketing services. Revenue streams likely derive from project-based contracts and ongoing client support. The company targets SMEs and individual entrepreneurs primarily within the Czech Republic. The partnership ecosystem includes local government, cultural, and commercial entities, enhancing credibility and market reach. Growth indicators include long-term client relationships and diversified service offerings. Operationally, the company uses a mix of legacy and modern web technologies, indicating potential modernization opportunities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of Google Analytics is configured to deny ad and analytics storage by default, reflecting privacy-conscious practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The site lacks a comprehensive privacy policy, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the website content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small digital agency but would benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  3. Create and publish terms of service and vulnerability disclosure policies to increase transparency and security readiness.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and meet web standards.
  5. Regularly update and modernize the technology stack to reduce technical debt and improve performance and security.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LD Studio
VAT number
CZ8902091550
Registration number
IČ: 02561824
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LD Studio
Description
Váš partner ve světě webových stránek, e-shopů a grafického designu
Key services
Grafický design, Webové stránky a e-shopy, Aplikace na míru, Tisk, Degustační balíčky, Doplňkové služby
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0, Swiper.js, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Google Fonts (Montserrat)
Frameworks
ASP.NET
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics with consent denied for ad_storage and analytics_storage

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust score.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern frontend libraries but lacks some security headers.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with company registration details.
  5. No privacy or terms of service pages found, but cookie consent mechanism is present.
  6. Content is business-focused, safe, and professionally presented.
  7. Multiple client testimonials and partner logos indicate established business relationships.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET Web Forms technology, utilizing jQuery 1.11.0 and Swiper.js for frontend interactivity. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated, with analytics configured to respect user privacy preferences. The site uses responsive design techniques for mobile optimization and includes structured navigation with dropdown menus. Performance is moderate, with no major blocking scripts detected. However, the use of an older jQuery version may pose security risks and modernization opportunities exist. The site lacks advanced SEO structured data such as JSON-LD. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs but could be improved with updated libraries, enhanced security headers, and richer SEO metadata.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ldstudio.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ldstudio.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.