Skip to main content

Security report for ldnx.co.uk

ASICS LDNX · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

57/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ASICS LDNX is a UK-based event organization specializing in a new 10k running challenge held in Wembley, London. The website presents a professional and well-branded digital presence, targeting runners and sports enthusiasts. It leverages partnerships with recognized brands such as ASICS and integrates social media and event updates effectively. The business model focuses on event promotion, participant engagement, and volunteer coordination. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and tracking tools, ensuring good performance and SEO optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, cookie consent, and bot management, though explicit security headers and incident response contacts could be improved. Overall, the site is trustworthy, compliant with GDPR, and provides a positive user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ldnx.co.uk

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
57

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention ldnx.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
15
Employees
0
Customers
15
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
0%

2 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for ldnx.co.uk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a new but credible player in the UK running event market, leveraging experience from established events like the London Winter Run. Its revenue streams likely include participant fees, sponsorships, and partnerships. The target audience includes amateur and professional runners in the UK. The partnership ecosystem is strong, involving sports brands, venue operators, and charity platforms. Growth indicators include active social media engagement and priority access registrations for future events. The business operates with a small to medium scale digital infrastructure, focusing on event-specific content and community building.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of Cloudflare Bot Management, and a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of a public security or incident response policy page are areas for improvement. The site does not provide a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure channel, which could enhance transparency and trust. Overall, the security measures are adequate for the business type but could be strengthened to align with best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a security.txt file and a dedicated vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Provide clear incident response contact information, including security or abuse email addresses, to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate risks from outdated components.
  5. Enhance user trust by including more detailed business contact information and possibly a data protection officer contact if applicable.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ASICS LDNX
Description
Prepare for ASICS LDNX, a thrilling new 10k challenge. This brand-new experience is brought to you by the same people behind smash-hit runs like Manchester Marathon and London Winter Run 10k.
Key services
10k running event organization, Participant updates and support, Volunteer coordination, Event weekend information and preparation resources
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Yoast SEO, CookieYes Consent, Instagram Feed Pro plugin, SiteOrigin Premium, 3D Flipbook plugin, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with customization
  • Use of Cloudflare Bot Management cookie
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected in scripts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
CookieYes Consent Management, Instagram Feed Pro
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professionally designed event site for ASICS LDNX 10k running event.
  2. Strong social media integration and active Instagram feed.
  3. Comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms in place.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact likely via Help Centre link.
  5. Use of multiple trusted third-party services and partners.
  6. No security or privacy policy pages explicitly linked in header but found in footer menus.
  7. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page.
  8. No explicit security or incident response contact information.
  9. Website uses HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  10. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Yoast SEO, and several plugins for cookie consent, Instagram feeds, and interactive content. Hosting is through a reputable registrar (123-Reg) with Cloudflare providing bot management services. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO metadata and structured data for enhanced search engine visibility. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times. The technical infrastructure supports a professional event website with dynamic content and social media integration, though security header implementation and incident response mechanisms could be improved.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ldnx.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ldnx.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.