Skip to main content

Security report for lcpconsulting.com

mostbet · Other · Azerbaijan

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website lcpconsulting.com operates as an online gambling platform branded as Mostbet, targeting Azerbaijani users with localized content and services. It offers a wide range of betting and casino games, including slots, live casino, and sports betting, supported by mobile applications for Android and iOS. The platform emphasizes licensed operation under Curacao jurisdiction and provides various bonuses and promotions to attract and retain users. The site is well-structured with comprehensive content, good design, and mobile optimization, facilitating a positive user experience. Technically, the site leverages Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, uses modern web technologies including JSON-LD for structured data, and provides mobile app downloads via APK and App Store. Performance is moderate with good SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate but could be improved by enabling DNSSEC, adding security headers, and publishing explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with privacy and cookie policies present but lacking active consent mechanisms. Security analysis reveals no blocking or WAF challenges, but WHOIS data raises concerns due to a future domain creation date and registration through a dropcatch registrar, which conflicts with the business's claimed founding year of 2009. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are published, and incident response information is absent, which reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional and professional but requires improvements in transparency, security, and compliance to enhance credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lcpconsulting.com

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Mostbet positions itself as a competitive regional online gambling operator in Azerbaijan, offering a broad portfolio of betting and casino products. Its business model relies on user acquisition through bonuses, localized payment options including AZN currency, and mobile accessibility. The platform targets adult users interested in online betting and casino entertainment. The company leverages international licensing (Curacao) and displays multiple trust badges to enhance legitimacy. However, the domain registration inconsistencies suggest recent acquisition or rebranding, which may impact perceived stability. The absence of direct contact information and incident response channels limits transparency. The platform's partnership ecosystem is not explicitly detailed, and no related or subsidiary domains were identified. Growth indicators include continuous content updates and mobile app deployment.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The platform uses HTTPS and Cloudflare services, which provide baseline security and performance benefits. However, the lack of DNSSEC, missing security headers (CSP, HSTS), and absence of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The site lacks visible cookie consent mechanisms, which may affect GDPR compliance. The WHOIS data inconsistency and registrar type raise concerns about domain legitimacy. Overall, the security posture is functional but requires enhancements in DNS security, header policies, and transparency to meet higher compliance and trust standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add an explicit cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with privacy regulations.
  5. Verify and clarify domain registration details to resolve inconsistencies and improve trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
mostbet
Description
Mostbet Azərbaycan onlayn mərc və kazino sektorunda istifadəçilərə etibarlı və funksional bir platforma təqdim edir. Burada mərc həvəskarları və kazino oyunlarını sevənlər geniş oyun seçimləri, müxtəlif promosyonlar və mobil rahatlıq imkanları ilə qarşılaşırlar. Platforma beynəlxalq Curacao lisenziyası əsasında fəaliyyət göstərir və şəffaf qaydalar təklif edir.
Key services
Online sports betting, Online casino games, Mobile betting applications, Bonus and promotional offers, 24/7 customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Cloudflare DNS, JavaScript, JSON-LD structured data, AMP (linked), CSS (style.min.css, main.css)
Platforms
Web, Android APK, iOS App Store
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by Cloudflare usage)
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • Use of SSL encryption mentioned
  • Two-factor authentication mentioned for account security

Analytics and tracking

Services
Cloudflare Insights
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Cloudflare Insights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a gambling platform targeting Azerbaijani users with localized content.
  2. Content is comprehensive and well-structured with detailed information about services and bonuses.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main pages.
  4. No visible security or incident response policies published.
  5. Use of Cloudflare DNS and CDN improves performance and security.
  6. No cookie consent banner detected despite cookie policy page.
  7. Mobile apps offered via APK and App Store with instructions.
  8. WHOIS data inconsistent with business claims, domain newly registered or placeholder.
  9. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack with Cloudflare DNS/CDN, JavaScript, and JSON-LD structured data for SEO and rich snippets. The site is mobile-optimized with dedicated Android APK and iOS App Store applications. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation. The site lacks a detectable CMS, suggesting a custom or static site build. The presence of Cloudflare Insights indicates basic analytics usage. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were identified. Opportunities exist to enhance security configurations and accessibility compliance to improve overall technical maturity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lcpconsulting.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lcpconsulting.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.