Skip to main content

Security report for lckyresponsibleplay.com

Glitnor Services Limited · Other · Malta

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Glitnor Services Limited and its associated companies operate multiple licensed online gambling brands targeting adult players primarily in Malta, Canada, and Sweden. The website emphasizes responsible gambling and player protection, reflecting a commitment to sustainable and ethical gaming practices. However, the domain WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy. Technically, the site is built on Webflow with standard web technologies, but lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. The absence of contact information and privacy policies limits transparency and user trust. Overall, the site presents a moderate risk profile with room for improvement in security and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lckyresponsibleplay.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the online gambling sector with multiple licensed brands, indicating a diversified portfolio and regulatory compliance in multiple jurisdictions. The focus on responsible gaming and player monitoring suggests a proactive approach to risk management. The company targets adult gamblers and stakeholders interested in safe gambling environments. The lack of domain registration data and minimal privacy disclosures may impact credibility and regulatory perception. Partnerships with multiple licensed entities enhance market reach and operational resilience.

Security posture

The security posture is moderate but incomplete. HTTPS is assumed but not confirmed with headers. No security headers were detected in the provided data, and no privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps. The site does not expose sensitive data or use vulnerable libraries, but lacks incident response contact points and formal security policies. Employee training on responsible gambling is highlighted, but technical security controls need enhancement to meet industry best practices and regulatory requirements such as GDPR and NIS2.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms.
  2. Ensure domain registration is properly completed and WHOIS data is available to improve legitimacy.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security incident response contacts and data protection officer details.
  5. Enhance accessibility and SEO features to improve user experience and search visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Glitnor Services Limited
Registration number
C85912
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Glitnor Services Limited
Description
Glitnor Services Limited and related companies operate online gambling brands such as LuckyCasino, FlaxCasino, and HappyCasino. They emphasize responsible gaming, player protection, and sustainable industry practices. The website provides information about their commitment to responsible play and player care.
Key services
Online casino gaming, Responsible gambling tools and player support, Player behavior monitoring and intervention
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Webflow, Google Fonts, jQuery 3.5.1, WebFont Loader
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided
  4. Site uses Webflow platform and standard web technologies
  5. Focus on responsible gambling and player protection
  6. WHOIS data missing, indicating possible domain registration issues
  7. External links point to gambling brands operated by companies registered in Malta and Canada
  8. No security headers detected in provided data
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond jQuery and WebFont loader
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Webflow CMS and leverages Google Fonts and jQuery libraries. Hosting is via Webflow's CDN, providing moderate performance and mobile responsiveness. The site lacks advanced frameworks or platforms beyond Webflow. SEO and accessibility are basic, with room for improvement. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The absence of security headers and privacy mechanisms suggests technical debt in security and compliance. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports basic functionality but requires modernization to meet current standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lckyresponsibleplay.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lckyresponsibleplay.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.