Lazdins Gavars is a specialized law firm targeting ambitious and fast-growing companies, offering a broad range of legal services including transaction support, dispute resolution, and compliance. The firm positions itself as a trusted advisor in the Baltic region with expertise in corporate structuring, venture capital, private equity, and emerging areas such as blockchain and digital assets. The website reflects a professional and modern digital presence, built on WordPress with a strong focus on user experience and mobile optimization. Security measures such as HTTPS, hCaptcha, and Google reCAPTCHA are implemented to protect user interactions, particularly on contact forms. While WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, the website's content and structure indicate a legitimate and credible business. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature security posture with room for improvement in security headers and incident response transparency.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Cookie Policy found
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
65
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention lazdinsgavars.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for lazdinsgavars.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The firm operates in the legal services sector, focusing on corporate clients requiring sophisticated legal advice in transactions, compliance, and dispute resolution. Their business model is service-oriented, relying on expert legal counsel and personalized client relationships. The website highlights key services and team expertise, indicating a small but specialized firm with a clear market niche. Social media presence on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Instagram supports brand visibility and client engagement. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust analysis, but the firm's professional presentation and detailed service offerings suggest a stable market position with growth potential in the Baltic legal market.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and integrates CAPTCHA mechanisms to secure form submissions, reducing spam and automated abuse. However, explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security are not confirmed in the HTML source and should be implemented to enhance protection against common web attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The absence of a public security policy or incident response information is a gap in transparency. Overall, the security posture is good for a small professional services website but could benefit from additional hardening and documented security practices.
Recommendations
Implement and verify HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen web security.
Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan to improve transparency and client trust.
Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Enhance privacy compliance disclosures, including cookie policy details and data retention practices.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Lazdins Gavars
Description
Law Firm Lazdins Gavars consists of an experienced team of legal experts specialized in transaction support, dispute resolution, and compliance.
WordPress, PHP, Bootstrap, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, hCaptcha, Google reCAPTCHA, Liquid Themes framework, WPBakery Page Builder
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
Use of hCaptcha and Google reCAPTCHA on forms
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
Secure form handling via Contact Form 7
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is professionally designed and well-structured
Content is comprehensive and focused on legal services for ambitious companies
Multiple service areas covered with detailed descriptions
Team members are presented with photos and bios
Contact information is clear and includes multiple channels
Use of modern web technologies and security measures like hCaptcha
No signs of malicious or suspicious content
No WHOIS data available due to query limit, but no red flags in website content
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress CMS using modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and jQuery, with additional plugins for SEO (Yoast), forms (Contact Form 7), and CAPTCHA (hCaptcha and Google reCAPTCHA). The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with some external resources loaded from Google Fonts and social media platforms. The use of video backgrounds and animations indicates a focus on user engagement. No critical technical debt or outdated libraries were detected, but continuous maintenance is recommended to ensure security and performance.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with lazdinsgavars.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lazdinsgavars.lv.