Skip to main content

Security report for lawyaw.com

Themis Solutions Inc. (Clio) · Technology · Canada

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

88/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Clio, operated by Themis Solutions Inc., is a leading provider of legal practice management and document automation software, targeting law firms and legal professionals. Their flagship product, Clio Draft, offers advanced legal document drafting, automation, and access to up-to-date court forms, enhancing law firm productivity and efficiency. The company positions itself strongly in the legal technology market with a comprehensive SaaS offering and a large user base, evidenced by extensive customer testimonials and industry partnerships. Technically, the website is built on WordPress and leverages modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, Google reCAPTCHA, Marketo for marketing automation, and Intellimize for personalization. Hosting is provided by WPEngine, ensuring good performance and scalability. The site is mobile-optimized, accessible, and SEO-friendly, with rich metadata and structured data enhancing search visibility. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS, employs multiple security headers, and uses secure form handling with CAPTCHA to prevent abuse. However, explicit security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not publicly available, representing areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data reduces transparency but does not detract significantly from the site's legitimacy given the professional presentation and consistent branding. Overall, Clio's website demonstrates a mature digital presence with strong business credibility and technical implementation. Strategic recommendations include publishing detailed security and incident response policies, adding vulnerability disclosure information, and enhancing transparency around data protection officer contacts and certifications to further build trust and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
95/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing X-XSS-Protection header

      Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

      What to do: Add "X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block"

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  3. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching lawyaw.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
70
Email security
82
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
95
Average
88

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Clio operates in the legal technology sector, offering SaaS solutions that streamline law firm operations through document automation, client intake, and practice management. Their business model is subscription-based, targeting solo practitioners to large law firms. The company has a strong market position supported by a broad product suite and integrations. Revenue streams likely include tiered subscriptions and add-on services. The target customer segment is legal professionals seeking efficiency and compliance. Growth indicators include new product launches, extensive marketing efforts, and active community engagement. The partnership ecosystem includes marketing platforms and legal industry bodies. Operationally, Clio emphasizes integration and user experience to maintain competitive advantage.

Security posture

Clio's website security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement, modern security headers, and anti-bot measures like Google reCAPTCHA. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analyzed content. However, the lack of a publicly accessible security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and may affect trust among security-conscious users. Compliance with GDPR is indicated through privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not explicitly visible. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by publishing more detailed security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response page to improve transparency.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file.
  3. Provide contact information for a Data Protection Officer or security contact.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate supply chain risks.
  5. Enhance communication of certifications and compliance frameworks to build trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Themis Solutions Inc.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Themis Solutions Inc. (Clio)
Description
Clio Draft is your law firm’s software solution for legal drafting, document automation, online templates, and cloud-based court forms. Book a free demo.
Key services
Legal document drafting automation, Document templates, Court forms access, E-signature, Client questionnaires, Integration with Clio Manage
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, Google reCAPTCHA, Marketo, Intellimize, Wistia video embeds
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web, Android app, iOS app
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure cookie handling with domain scoping

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Marketo Munchkin, Segment
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, Twitter Ads, LinkedIn Ads, Bing Ads
Tracking pixels
Marketo Munchkin, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Segment
Marketing tools
Marketo, Intellimize, Segment
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. Strong focus on legal document automation and law firm productivity.
  3. Multiple calls to action for demos and trials.
  4. Integration with marketing and analytics platforms is extensive.
  5. No signs of malware, phishing, or suspicious content.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces transparency but not necessarily legitimacy.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies are present and comprehensive.
  8. Contact information is clearly provided with company domain emails and phone numbers.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, hosted on WPEngine, and uses a modern tech stack including JavaScript, HTML5, and CSS3. It integrates marketing automation tools like Marketo and personalization services like Intellimize. Performance is optimized with preloading fonts and images, and mobile responsiveness is excellent. SEO is well implemented with comprehensive meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Accessibility features are present but could be further enhanced. The technical infrastructure supports scalability and a positive user experience, though continuous monitoring of third-party dependencies is advised to mitigate potential risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lawyaw.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lawyaw.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.