Laurence Keenan Advocates & Solicitors is a well-established Isle of Man law firm founded in 1992, offering a broad range of legal services including personal, family, and commercial law. The firm targets clients requiring expert legal advice with a global reach, maintaining a professional and consistent brand presence online. The website is built on WordPress using the Foundation framework, incorporating modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Zepto, delivering a moderate performance with good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though additional security headers and a cookie consent mechanism would enhance compliance and protection. The absence of social media links and minimal tracking indicates a privacy-conscious approach. Overall, the site reflects a credible and trustworthy legal practice with room for technical and compliance improvements.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
No HTTPS encryption
GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data
What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
52
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention laurencekeenan.com, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for laurencekeenan.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The firm positions itself as a niche legal service provider with a strong regional presence and international reach. Its partnership with Legalink and a professional website developer indicates strategic alliances and investment in digital presence. The business model focuses on legal advisory and advocacy, targeting both individuals and commercial clients. The website content and structure support clear communication of services and policies, enhancing client trust. The lack of visible phone numbers or direct contact emails on the homepage suggests a preference for controlled client engagement, possibly via contact forms or direct outreach. The firm’s longevity and consistent domain registration support its market credibility.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and no exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of an incident response or vulnerability disclosure page indicate areas for improvement. No signs of vulnerable libraries or insecure forms were detected. The firm should consider implementing a cookie consent mechanism to align with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the website content, suggesting potential gaps in transparency or communication of security policies.
Recommendations
Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
Publish an incident response policy and contact channels for security issues to improve trust and readiness.
Consider adding a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.
Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Laurence Keenan Advocates Limited
Description
Laurence Keenan Advocates & Solicitors is an Isle of Man Law Practice with global reach. They advise on a wide range of cases from personal and family matters to complex commercial issues. Founded in 1992, the firm comprises Manx Advocates and qualified English Solicitors.
Key services
Legal advice, Advocacy, Solicitor services, Family law, Commercial law
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
jQuery, Zepto, Modernizr, WordPress
Frameworks
Foundation CSS Framework
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enforced
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
No visible vulnerable libraries
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is professionally designed and consistent with a legal services firm.
No visible security or privacy policy gaps except missing cookie consent.
No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms.
No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable scripts detected.
Limited use of analytics or tracking technologies, indicating privacy respect.
Clear navigation with links to important legal and compliance documents.
Contact information is present but no explicit phone numbers found in HTML.
No social media links detected in the provided content.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress with a Foundation CSS framework and uses common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Zepto. The site loads scripts asynchronously where possible and uses modern emoji support scripts. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and has basic accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta viewport and robots tags but lacks Open Graph or JSON-LD structured data for enhanced search engine understanding. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal data collection. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from modernization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with laurencekeenan.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review laurencekeenan.com.