Skip to main content

Security report for launchpad.net

Canonical Ltd. · Technology · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and GDPR outside view.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Launchpad is a mature software collaboration platform owned by Canonical Ltd., providing a comprehensive suite of services including bug tracking, code hosting, code reviews, and Ubuntu package building. It serves a broad audience of software developers and open source communities, integrating tightly with the Ubuntu ecosystem. The platform is well-established, with a domain age consistent with its founding in 2004, and maintains a strong market position as a key tool for open source project management. Technically, the website employs a mix of modern and legacy technologies such as YUI and Vanilla Framework, delivering good performance, accessibility, and SEO optimization. Hosting and domain management are consistent with Canonical's infrastructure, and the site is fully accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms. However, some modernization opportunities exist, particularly in security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses domain status locks to prevent unauthorized domain changes, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. No direct contact emails or phone numbers for security or incident response were found, and no security.txt file is published. Privacy compliance is supported by a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service, though cookie consent mechanisms are absent. Overall, Launchpad presents a trustworthy and professional online presence with strong business credibility and technical maturity. Strategic improvements in security policy transparency, cookie consent, and DNS security would enhance its security posture and compliance standing.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of launchpad.net. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching launchpad.net

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
75
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention launchpad.net, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
18,168
Employees
0
Customers
18,144
Third parties
24
Weak passwords
13%

27 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for launchpad.net.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Launchpad operates as a platform-as-a-service targeting software developers and open source projects, leveraging Canonical Ltd.'s brand and Ubuntu ecosystem. Its competitive advantage lies in integrated tools for bug tracking, code hosting, and package management, supporting a large community with over 47,000 projects and millions of bugs tracked. Revenue likely derives from Canonical's broader business model, including enterprise support and services around Ubuntu. The platform fosters community engagement through translations, mailing lists, and FAQs, enhancing user retention and growth. Partnerships with Canonical and Ubuntu reinforce its market position. The absence of direct contact emails and phone numbers suggests a focus on web-based support channels. The platform's longevity and active blog indicate ongoing development and community interaction.

Security posture

Launchpad demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, domain registration protections, and secure cookie settings. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The lack of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and may hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. Privacy compliance is supported by a detailed privacy policy, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which could be a compliance risk under GDPR. Overall, the platform is secure but would benefit from enhanced security controls and clearer communication of security practices.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the launchpad.net domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and serve security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  3. Add a visible cookie consent banner or mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide clear incident response contact information, including security@ or abuse@ email addresses.
  5. Consider creating and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Canonical Ltd.
Description
Launchpad is a software collaboration platform that provides bug tracking, code hosting, code reviews, Ubuntu package building and hosting, crowd sourced translations, mailing lists, answer tracking, and specification tracking.
Key services
Bug tracking, Code hosting (Git and Bazaar), Code reviews, Ubuntu package building and hosting, Crowd sourced translations, Mailing lists, Answer tracking and FAQs, Specification tracking (blueprints)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
YUI JavaScript library, Git, Bazaar, HTML5, CSS3, Vanilla Framework 4.7.0
Frameworks
YUI, Vanilla Framework
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited, clientTransferProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure cookie scope with Secure and Domain flags

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich and relevant to software collaboration and open source communities.
  3. Strong association with Canonical Ltd. and Ubuntu ecosystem.
  4. No explicit privacy or cookie consent banners detected despite GDPR compliance in privacy policy.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via support form.
  6. No security.txt or explicit security policy page found.
  7. Modern web technologies used but some older libraries like YUI are still present.
  8. No advertising or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  9. Good SEO and accessibility practices observed.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom CMS with a technology stack including YUI JavaScript libraries and the Vanilla Framework for styling. The site is well-structured with proper meta tags, Open Graph data, and responsive design elements. Performance is optimized with combined and minified scripts. Hosting appears to be managed by Canonical, supported by domain registrar MarkMonitor Inc. The site lacks modern JavaScript frameworks but maintains good accessibility and SEO standards. Some legacy technologies like YUI could be updated to improve maintainability and security. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating a privacy-conscious implementation. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 76/100Low28 findingsView report
  2. 76/100Low23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with launchpad.net. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review launchpad.net.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.