Skip to main content

Security report for lauatennis.ee

Eesti Lauatenniseliit · Other · Estonia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eesti Lauatenniseliit is the official Estonian Table Tennis Federation, serving as the national governing body for table tennis in Estonia. The website provides comprehensive information on competitions, clubs, youth sports, rankings, rules, and contact details, targeting players, clubs, and enthusiasts within the Estonian table tennis community. The business model is that of a non-profit sports federation focused on organizational and informational services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Elementor page builder and OceanWP theme, incorporating modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper.js, and Tippy.js. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and content quality, though performance is moderate. Analytics are handled via plausible.io, indicating a privacy-conscious approach but lacking explicit cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks visible security headers and incident response contacts. No privacy or cookie policies are present, representing compliance gaps. The WHOIS data is consistent with the website's identity, showing legitimate registration without privacy protection, appropriate for a public sports federation. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but should improve privacy compliance and security best practices to enhance user trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lauatennis.ee

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Estonian Table Tennis Federation holds a strong national position as the official sports governing body for table tennis. Its competitive advantage lies in its authoritative role and comprehensive service offerings including competition management, club administration, youth sports coordination, and information dissemination. The federation targets athletes, clubs, and sports enthusiasts, with growth indicators seen in active event coverage and youth engagement. Partnerships with international and national sports organizations are evident through linked domains. The business operates primarily as a non-profit entity with a focus on community and sport development rather than commercial revenue streams.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of incident response or vulnerability disclosure information indicate areas for improvement. Compliance with GDPR is incomplete due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of modern libraries reduces vulnerability risks, but the site would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency to better protect user data and respond to incidents.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page with contact information for incident reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Establish a long-term security strategy including regular audits and user data protection measures.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Eesti Lauatenniseliit
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eesti Lauatenniseliit
Description
Eesti Lauatenniseliit is the Estonian Table Tennis Federation, providing information about table tennis competitions, clubs, youth sports, rankings, rules, and contact details. It serves as the official body for table tennis in Estonia.
Key services
Competition organization and results publication, Club information and administration, Youth sports coordination, Ranking and rules dissemination, Information system ELTLIS
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Elementor, jQuery, Swiper.js, Tippy.js, FontAwesome, OceanWP theme
Frameworks
Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No visible exposed sensitive data
  • Use of modern JS libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
plausible.io
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
plausible.io
Marketing tools
plausible.io
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based sports federation site with good content and navigation.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided in the footer.
  4. No visible security.txt or incident response contacts.
  5. Uses modern frontend libraries and plugins.
  6. No signs of blocking or WAF interference.
  7. External links mostly to relevant sports and partner organizations.
  8. Analytics via plausible.io indicates privacy-conscious tracking but no cookie consent mechanism found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a well-supported CMS (WordPress) with a popular theme (OceanWP) and page builder (Elementor), ensuring ease of content management and flexibility. The tech stack includes modern JavaScript libraries for UI enhancements. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags. However, the lack of advanced security headers and privacy compliance features indicates technical debt in security and compliance domains. Hosting provider details are not explicit, which could be clarified for better infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lauatennis.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lauatennis.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.