Skip to main content

Security report for latviatimber.lv

Latvia Timber International · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Latvia Timber International is a well-established Latvian company specializing in the manufacturing and processing of timber products, with over 30 years of industry experience. The company offers a range of services including drying, painting, planing, and impregnation of wood materials, serving clients primarily in construction and packaging sectors. Their market position is strengthened by multiple industry certifications and a professional team. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and uses common libraries like jQuery and Slick Carousel. The site is mobile-optimized and includes Google Analytics for user tracking. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses a plugin to prevent user enumeration, but lacks visible security headers and a published privacy or cookie policy, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, though the absence of WHOIS data limits full domain legitimacy verification.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching latviatimber.lv

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on timber products with a medium-sized business scale. Its competitive advantages include long-standing industry experience, recognized certifications (FSC®, PEFC, ISO), and a diversified service offering. The business model centers on production and value-added wood processing services. The target customers are businesses requiring quality timber materials and related services. The presence of a Danish branch indicates international reach and partnership expansion. The company maintains active social media channels and a clear contact infrastructure, supporting customer engagement and trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and some security measures like user enumeration prevention. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies represent gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not provide GDPR compliance details or cookie consent mechanisms, which are critical for privacy compliance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced by implementing best practices and transparency in privacy and incident response.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent banner to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add an incident response or abuse contact page to enhance security transparency.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide more detailed SEO metadata to improve user experience and search rankings.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “Latvia Timber International”
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Latvia Timber International
Description
Latvia Timber International is a company founded in 1992 with over 30 years of experience in the wood processing industry. Located in Limbaži, Latvia, it produces various types of timber from pine, spruce, and larch for uses ranging from packaging materials to fine construction details. The company emphasizes a professional team and customer appreciation. It holds multiple certifications including FSC®, PEFC, NTR, HT, CE, and ISO 50001:2011.
Key services
Timber production, Drying, Painting, Planing, Impregnation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 5, Slick Carousel, GLightbox, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, WordPress
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugin to prevent user enumeration

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. No privacy or cookie policy found on the homepage content.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with emails, phones, and addresses.
  5. Multiple certifications are listed indicating industry compliance.
  6. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress) with common plugins.
  7. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  8. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking with moderate user tracking level.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information found.
  10. Social media presence on Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with Bootstrap framework and common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slick Carousel. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking. The site loads resources from trusted CDNs like jsdelivr.net. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization in place. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No hosting provider details were found. The site uses a security plugin to prevent user enumeration, indicating some attention to security. However, the absence of security headers and privacy mechanisms suggests technical debt in security and compliance areas.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with latviatimber.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review latviatimber.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.