Skip to main content

Security report for latroof.lv

LATROOF Ltd SIA · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

41/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LATROOF Ltd SIA is a Latvian wholesale distributor specializing in roofing and construction materials, operating for approximately 15 years. The company represents leading European manufacturers and offers a broad product catalog including roof coverings, insulation, and construction films. Their market position is established within Latvia's construction sector, targeting professionals and retail customers. The website reflects a medium-sized business with consistent branding and a focus on product and project presentation. Technically, the site uses legacy JavaScript libraries and common marketing tools such as Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, with moderate performance and good mobile responsiveness. Security posture is moderate but lacks advanced headers and uses outdated libraries, presenting potential vulnerabilities. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the site is professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching latroof.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
41

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a wholesale distributor and official representative of European construction material manufacturers, focusing on roofing and insulation products. Their business model relies on partnerships with multiple manufacturers and serving the Latvian construction market. The website showcases product categories, projects, and manufacturer brands, indicating a broad portfolio. Contact information and social media presence support customer engagement. The lack of detailed privacy and security policies suggests room for improvement in regulatory compliance. The company appears stable with a clear market niche but should enhance digital trust signals to strengthen competitive advantage.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and uses security tools like Google reCAPTCHA for form protection. However, it lacks critical security headers such as Content Security Policy and HSTS, and uses an outdated jQuery version (1.8.3) known for vulnerabilities. No incident response or security contact information is provided. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. These factors reduce the overall security maturity and expose the site to potential risks. Immediate upgrades to libraries, implementation of security headers, and publication of privacy policies are recommended to improve security posture and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions.
  3. Add and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Publish incident response and security contact information to improve transparency.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
LATROOF Ltd SIA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LATROOF Ltd SIA
Description
Vairumtirdzniecības bāze LATROOF Latvijas tirgū strādā jau 15 gadus un ir Eiropas vadošo celtniecības materiālu ražotāju oficiālais pārstāvis. Galvenais virziens ir jumtu materiāli un viss nepieciešamais jumta ierīkošanai, kā arī siltumizolācijas materiāli un celtniecības plēves. Produkcijai ir atbilstoši Eiropas kvalitātes sertifikāti un ražotāja garantija.
Key services
roofing materials, thermal insulation materials, construction films, product catalog, project portfolio, manufacturer partnerships
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS (multiple responsive stylesheets), JavaScript, jQuery 1.8.3, jQuery UI 1.10.3, Slick slider, Fancybox, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Google reCAPTCHA v2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA on subscription form
  • Login form uses POST method
  • No visible exposed sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is in Latvian language targeting local market.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented in footer and login forms.
  5. Multiple social media links to Facebook, Twitter, Draugiem.lv, YouTube.
  6. Use of multiple Google and Facebook marketing and analytics tools.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies.
  8. Outdated JavaScript libraries may pose security risks.
  9. No structured data (JSON-LD or Open Graph) detected in HTML head.
  10. Business appears to be a medium-sized wholesale distributor in construction materials.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML5 and CSS, enhanced by jQuery and jQuery UI for interactivity, and uses Slick slider and Fancybox for UI components. Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are integrated for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive with multiple CSS stylesheets targeting different screen sizes. However, the use of outdated jQuery (1.8.3) is a technical debt and security risk. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with limited meta tags and no structured data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with latroof.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review latroof.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.