Skip to main content

Security report for lasvegaslightsfc.com

Las Vegas Lights FC · Other · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Las Vegas Lights FC is a professional soccer team based in Downtown Las Vegas, competing in the USL Championship. The website serves as a hub for fans to purchase tickets, shop merchandise, and stay updated with team news. The site demonstrates a solid market position within the professional sports sector, targeting soccer enthusiasts and the local community. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with React components and integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Weglot for multilingual support. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, with good content quality and consistent branding. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and standard security headers present, alongside a cookie consent mechanism ensuring privacy compliance. However, the absence of publicly available WHOIS data and lack of explicit contact or security policies slightly reduce trustworthiness. Overall, the site is professional and functional, supporting the business objectives effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lasvegaslightsfc.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
45
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Las Vegas Lights FC website positions the team as a key player in the USL Championship soccer league, leveraging digital channels to engage fans and drive revenue through ticket sales and merchandise. The business model focuses on sports entertainment and community engagement. The site links to multiple USL league partner domains, indicating a strong partnership ecosystem. The use of advanced marketing tools and analytics suggests a data-driven approach to fan engagement and marketing. The absence of detailed company registration or contact information online is a minor gap but does not detract significantly from the business credibility given the official league affiliations and social media presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and includes essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, reducing common web vulnerabilities. Cookie consent is implemented via Osano, indicating GDPR compliance. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the analysis. However, the site lacks a dedicated security policy or incident response contact information, which are best practices for professional organizations. There is no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found, which could improve transparency and security posture. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced with formal policies and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact page to improve transparency and trust.
  2. Implement a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting of security issues.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
  4. Add clear company contact information including emails and phone numbers to facilitate communication and support.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerabilities or outdated components are present.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Las Vegas Lights FC
Description
Las Vegas Lights FC is your home for professional soccer in Downtown Las Vegas. Buy tickets, shop the team store, and read Lights news here.
Key services
Professional soccer matches, Ticket sales, Team merchandise store, News and updates
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, React, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Weglot (translation), SportsEngine platform, FontAwesome
Frameworks
React
Platforms
WordPress, SportsEngine
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
ShareThis, Weglot, Olark Chat
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional sports team site for Las Vegas Lights FC.
  2. Content is rich with team info, ticket sales, and news.
  3. Uses multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools.
  4. Good privacy and cookie consent implementation.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or not publicly available, which is unusual.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies found.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt detected.
  9. Site is accessible with no WAF blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform enhanced with React for dynamic components. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Weglot for multilingual support. The site uses SportsEngine's platform for sports-specific functionalities. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices implemented via Yoast SEO. The site uses FontAwesome for icons and includes chat support via Olark. While the technical stack is robust and modern, opportunities exist to improve accessibility and reduce reliance on multiple external scripts to optimize load times and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lasvegaslightsfc.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lasvegaslightsfc.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.