Skip to main content

Security report for las-snezniknanos.si

Društvo za razvoj podeželja med Snežnikom in Nanosom · Government · Slovenia

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website represents a Slovenian local action group focused on rural development between the Snežnik and Nanos regions. It operates as a non-profit organization facilitating regional projects, cooperation, and community engagement, primarily funded through EU and national programs. The site provides structured information about projects, calls for funding, and organizational details, targeting local municipalities and stakeholders. Technically, the website uses standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, and some UI libraries like Slick Carousel and Shadowbox. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clear navigation structure but lacks advanced CMS or modern frameworks. Security posture is basic with HTTPS assumed but no visible security headers or advanced protections. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating compliance gaps. Contact information is not explicitly provided, limiting user engagement channels. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance, security best practices, and contact transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching las-snezniknanos.si

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization is positioned as a regional development facilitator in Slovenia, working closely with local municipalities such as Pivka, Postojna, and Ilirska Bistrica. Its business model revolves around managing and promoting EU-funded rural development projects, providing calls for proposals, and engaging community partners. The website reflects a stable presence since 2016, with a focus on transparency through project archives and documentation. The partnership ecosystem includes local government bodies and other regional development organizations. Revenue streams likely come from public funding and grants. Growth indicators include ongoing projects and workshops. The organization maintains a moderate digital presence with limited marketing or analytics tools, focusing on informational content rather than commercial activities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security maturity level. HTTPS is used, ensuring encrypted communication. However, there is an absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No forms are present that collect sensitive user data, reducing immediate risk exposure. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance issues with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not provided, limiting transparency in security management. No known vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational site but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Add explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve user engagement and trust.
  4. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility to improve user experience across devices.
  5. Consider integrating an incident response contact or security.txt file to improve transparency and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Društvo za razvoj podeželja med Snežnikom in Nanosom
Description
Local Action Group for rural development between Snežnik and Nanos, focusing on regional development projects, cooperation, and community engagement in the Primorsko-notranjska region of Slovenia.
Key services
Project coordination and management, Funding calls and grants administration, Community and partner engagement, Publication and promotion of regional development initiatives
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Shadowbox
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage assumed (URL is https)
  • No visible forms collecting sensitive data

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional development non-profit focused on rural areas in Slovenia.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on the homepage or footer.
  4. No forms detected that collect user data.
  5. Uses standard JavaScript libraries and CSS for UI but no advanced frameworks.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security configurations.
  8. Content is well structured with clear navigation menus and categorized project information.
  9. Mobile optimization is basic with some responsive CSS but no advanced mobile features.
  10. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies without a detectable CMS, suggesting a custom or static site approach. It uses jQuery and UI libraries like Slick Carousel and Shadowbox for interactive elements. The site loads moderate CSS and JavaScript resources, indicating average performance. Mobile optimization is basic with some responsive CSS rules but lacks advanced adaptive features. SEO is basic with meta description and keywords placeholders present but not fully populated. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Hosting appears to be managed by the registrar Webtasy, d.o.o., a Slovenian hosting provider. The site could benefit from modern CMS adoption or framework use to improve maintainability and scalability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with las-snezniknanos.si. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review las-snezniknanos.si.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.