Skip to main content

Security report for larajobs.com

LaraJobs · Technology · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LaraJobs is a specialized job board dedicated to Laravel developers and related technology professionals. It serves as a platform for job listings, consultant listings, and industry articles, targeting Laravel developers and employers seeking talent in this niche. The website positions itself as a trusted resource within the Laravel community, supported by testimonials and endorsements from notable companies. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including Laravel, VueJS, Livewire, and TailwindCSS, and is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services. However, the SSL certificate is invalid or missing, resulting in no HTTPS support, which is a significant security concern. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies, which impacts its compliance posture. Advertising and analytics tools such as Google Ads and Google Tag Manager are used, indicating moderate user tracking. Overall, the site offers good content quality and user experience but requires urgent improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and protect users.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching larajobs.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LaraJobs operates in the technology sector as a niche job board focusing on Laravel-related roles. Its business model revolves around job postings, consultant listings, and an affiliate program, catering to a global audience of developers and employers. The platform leverages partnerships with UserScape and Laravel News, enhancing its credibility and reach. Revenue streams likely include job posting fees and affiliate commissions. The site demonstrates consistent branding and professional content, with a strong presence in the Laravel community. However, the absence of explicit privacy policies and security certifications may limit its appeal to privacy-conscious users and enterprise clients. The platform's integration with multiple external job application services broadens its market reach but also introduces dependencies on third-party platforms.

Security posture

The current security posture of LaraJobs is weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of HTTPS support, exposing users to potential data interception risks. No security headers are implemented, and there is no evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The site does not employ modern TLS protocols or security best practices such as HSTS or OCSP stapling. While no active vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, the lack of fundamental security measures significantly increases risk. Additionally, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. These gaps could lead to reputational damage and legal liabilities if not addressed promptly.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and properly configure a valid SSL certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR and global privacy compliance.
  4. Establish a formal vulnerability disclosure program and incident response plan to enhance security readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
Technical notes

Notes

LaraJobs utilizes a modern technology stack centered around Laravel PHP framework, complemented by frontend technologies such as VueJS, Livewire, AlpineJS, and TailwindCSS. The site integrates third-party libraries like Swiper.js and Choices.js for UI enhancements. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing performance and security benefits, although SSL is misconfigured. Performance metrics indicate a slow load time (~5.9 seconds) and moderate page size (~151 KB), suggesting room for optimization. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design elements and accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but requires improvements in SSL configuration and performance optimization to enhance user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with larajobs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review larajobs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.