Skip to main content

Security report for lapp.com

LAPP · Manufacturing · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

LAPP is a globally recognized enterprise specializing in cable and connection technology, offering a comprehensive product portfolio exceeding 40,000 items. The company targets industrial and commercial customers worldwide, positioning itself as a leading supplier in its sector. The website reflects a professional B2B business model with regional subsidiaries and partner sites supporting global operations. Technically, the site is built on a modern Angular framework with SAP Spartacus storefront, ensuring good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, though explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are absent, representing areas for improvement. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which slightly impacts trust but does not overshadow the professional presentation and global footprint. Overall, the website is secure, compliant, and professionally maintained, supporting LAPP's market position effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lapp.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lapp.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4,717
Employees
1
Customers
4,697
Third parties
19
Weak passwords
4%

Latest record dated 2025-04-15 · 8 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for lapp.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –test-login.lapp.com2025-04-15

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

LAPP operates in the manufacturing and technology sectors, focusing on cable and connection technology products. Its business model is B2B, serving industrial clients globally through a network of subsidiaries and partners. The company leverages an online shop to facilitate product ordering, indicating a digital sales channel. The presence of multiple country-specific domains and partner sites highlights a strong regional market penetration strategy. LAPP's competitive advantage lies in its extensive product range and global supply capabilities. The website's professional design and consistent branding reinforce its credibility and market leadership. However, the lack of publicly available WHOIS data suggests a need for enhanced transparency to bolster trust further.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposure of sensitive data. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file is present, which could hinder incident response and vulnerability reporting. The lack of a cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap under GDPR. No contact information for security incidents or data protection officers is found, indicating limited transparency in security governance. Overall, while the site is secure for general use, improvements in security headers, incident response transparency, and privacy compliance are recommended.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Deploy a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability reporting and incident response.
  4. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection officers to improve trust and compliance.
  5. Verify and publish domain WHOIS information or ensure registrar transparency to strengthen domain legitimacy and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
LAPP
Description
We are the world's leading supplier of cables, wires and accessories with more than 40,000 items in stock. Order our articles in the online shop.
Key services
cables, wires, accessories, online shop
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Angular 19.2.14, TypeScript, JavaScript, CSS, HTML5
Frameworks
Angular
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by canonical URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
userlikeTrackingEvent
Marketing tools
Userlike chat tracking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable for the domain www.lapp.com.
  3. Website uses modern Angular framework and SAP Spartacus storefront.
  4. Privacy policy and imprint pages are present and accessible.
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the homepage.
  6. Multiple external partner domains linked for regional presence.
  7. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite GDPR compliance claim.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in HTML content.
  9. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  10. Content is professional, B2B focused, and safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Angular 19.2.14 and SAP Spartacus storefront, indicating a modern and scalable technical infrastructure. The use of preloaded fonts and modular JavaScript files suggests optimization efforts for performance. Mobile responsiveness and accessibility features are well implemented, supporting a broad user base. SEO is addressed with proper meta tags and canonical URLs. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and no advanced performance metrics are available. The absence of explicit security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates areas where technical improvements can be made to enhance security and compliance. Overall, the technical stack is modern and well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lapp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lapp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.