Skip to main content

Security report for lapinastelpa.lv

Lapiņas telpa · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lapiņas telpa is a specialized interior design studio based in Latvia, led by Inese Lapiņa, offering personalized and functional interior design services, consultations, and educational courses. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and multimedia content, targeting individuals and businesses seeking interior design solutions and training. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Ecwid for e-commerce, hosted on a platform that supports service workers for offline capabilities. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and service worker usage, but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent and privacy policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lapinastelpa.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
70
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lapinastelpa.lv, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lapinastelpa.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in a niche market of interior design and education, providing full-cycle design projects, consultations, and digital courses. Its competitive advantage lies in a personalized approach, long industry experience, and a focus on harmonizing aesthetics with functionality. Revenue streams likely include design services, online courses, and product sales via the e-shop. The target audience includes Latvian residents and remote clients interested in improving their living or commercial spaces. The company maintains active social media channels to engage clients and build trust. Growth potential exists through expanding digital offerings and enhancing online presence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and registers a service worker, indicating a baseline security awareness. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No explicit privacy or cookie policies were found, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency. Tracking technologies like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel are used, but privacy compliance mechanisms are minimal. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to improve transparency and incident response readiness.
  4. Monitor and update third-party scripts regularly to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular audits to improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lapiņas telpa
Description
Interjera dizaina studija piedāvā personalizētus un funkcionālus risinājumus mājokļiem un komerctelpām, interjera dizaina konsultācijas, kursus un meistarklases. Uzsvars uz harmonisku, ergonomisku un estētisku dzīves telpu radīšanu, kas atbilst klientu vajadzībām un dzīvesveidam.
Key services
Interjera dizaina izstrāde, Telpu plānojuma konsultācijas, Krāsu un materiālu izvēle, Mēbeļu un dekoru atlase, Apgaismojuma plānošana, Digitālie kursi un meistarklases
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Ecwid e-commerce script, Skrollr.js (parallax scrolling), Service Worker for PWA, FontAwesome, Custom fonts (Roboto, Poppins, Syne, Montserrat)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service Worker registered for offline support

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  5. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain trust verification
  6. Use of modern web technologies and tracking tools
  7. Good branding and consistent design
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a proprietary CMS platform (multiscreensite.com) with integration of popular analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. It uses modern fonts and responsive design techniques, including service workers for PWA functionality. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. The site lacks advanced frameworks but uses JavaScript libraries like Skrollr for parallax effects. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured data (FAQ schema). Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete privacy compliance. Hosting provider details are not explicit from the data.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lapinastelpa.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lapinastelpa.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.