Skip to main content

Security report for lantmannenunibake.com

Lantmännen Unibake · Manufacturing · Sweden

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

77/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lantmännen Unibake is a global leader in bakery products and part of the larger Lantmännen agricultural cooperative based in Sweden. The company operates internationally, offering a wide range of food products including flour, pasta, and various bakery items targeting both professional customers and consumers. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with clear navigation and multilingual support for various markets. Technically, the site uses modern analytics and consent management tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent implemented, though explicit security headers and a published security policy are absent. The lack of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, but the overall business credibility remains high due to the professional presentation and association with the reputable Lantmännen group. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing privacy and security policies, and improving transparency around incident response.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lantmannenunibake.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
60
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
77

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong market position as a global bakery leader within the agricultural cooperative Lantmännen. Its diversified business model spans agriculture, machinery, energy, and food sectors, with a focus on sustainable and climate-smart products. The target audience includes professional food service customers and consumers worldwide. The website's multilingual market sites and brand portfolio indicate a broad international footprint. Partnerships and subsidiaries are clearly linked, reinforcing the corporate structure. Growth indicators include investment in innovation and research. The company maintains a strong brand identity and trust signals through consistent design and cookie compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a gap. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting transparency for security researchers. Incident response contact information is not publicly available, which could delay handling of security issues. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Compliance with GDPR is partially indicated by cookie consent but lacks a visible privacy policy. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with enhanced headers, published policies, and incident response details.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy or incident response page including contact details for reporting vulnerabilities or incidents.
  4. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lantmännen Unibake
Description
Lantmännen Unibake is part of Lantmännen, an agricultural cooperative and Northern Europe’s leader in agriculture, machinery, bioenergy and food products. The Food Sector develops, processes and markets bakery and food products including flour, breakfast foods, pasta, frozen and fresh bread, crispbread and ready-to-eat meals.
Key services
bakery products, flour and breakfast foods, pasta, frozen and fresh bread, crispbread, ready-to-eat meals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Google Maps MarkerClusterer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Application Insights
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo, Microsoft Application Insights
Marketing tools
OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professional and consistent with a large agricultural cooperative and food production business.
  3. Cookie consent is implemented via OneTrust, indicating GDPR compliance efforts.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in the provided HTML snippet; contact is via contact pages/forms.
  6. Use of multiple analytics and tracking tools including Matomo, Google Tag Manager, and Microsoft Application Insights.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  8. No explicit security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. WHOIS data is missing or not publicly available, which is a concern for domain legitimacy but may be due to privacy protection or recent registration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Matomo Analytics, Microsoft Application Insights, and OneTrust for cookie consent management. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO practices such as canonical and hreflang tags for internationalization. Performance is moderate with deferred and async loading of scripts. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting provider details are not evident from the content. The site structure is clear with megamenu navigation and multilingual support. Technical risks include missing security headers and incomplete WHOIS data which may affect trust and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lantmannenunibake.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lantmannenunibake.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.