Skip to main content

Security report for lansoftware.de

Computer-L.A.N. GmbH · Technology · Germany

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Computer-L.A.N. GmbH operates LAN Software, a specialized software house based in Fulda, Germany, focusing on software solutions for education institutions, seminar houses, authorities, and group accommodations. Their offerings include cloud-based seminar management (LANcloud), house and academy management (AkademieManager), group house management (HausManager), and ERP and HCM solutions via Sage partnerships. The company positions itself as an experienced, regional provider with a strong focus on tailored business software and customer support including workshops and training. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks, including Yoast SEO, Bootstrap, and Borlabs Cookie for privacy compliance. The site is well-optimized for SEO and mobile devices, with moderate performance and good accessibility. Security posture is solid with HTTPS, cookie consent, and no visible vulnerabilities, though some HTTP security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is robust with clear policies and consent mechanisms. Overall, the domain registration and WHOIS data align well with the business claims, indicating legitimacy and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 19 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lansoftware.de

This scan found 23 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
100
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention lansoftware.de, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for lansoftware.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets education and group housing sectors with specialized software solutions, leveraging SaaS and traditional software sales. Their competitive advantage lies in integrated management solutions tailored to seminar and group house operations, combined with ERP and HCM offerings. Revenue streams likely include software licenses, cloud subscriptions, consulting, and training workshops. The presence of multiple partner domains and authorized Sage partnership indicates a healthy ecosystem. Growth indicators include active news updates and new hires. The company maintains a professional online presence with clear contact information and client references, supporting credibility and market positioning.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent management via Borlabs Cookie, and integration of Google Tag Manager with consent mode. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security policies or incident response contacts is a gap. The site would benefit from implementing standard HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page was found, which could improve transparency and trust. Overall, the security posture is good but can be enhanced with additional best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen site security.
  2. Update jQuery to the latest stable version to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information.
  4. Add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  5. Continue maintaining and auditing cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Computer-L.A.N. GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Computer-L.A.N. GmbH
Description
LAN Software ist ein Softwarehaus aus Fulda mit langjähriger Erfahrung. Business-Software für Bildungseinrichtungen, Seminarhäuser, Behörden und Gruppenhäuser. Autorisierter Sage-Partner.
Key services
LANcloud seminar and resource management, AkademieManager seminar and house management, HausManager group house management, ERP solutions (Sage 100), HCM solutions (Sage HR Suite), Support and training workshops
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, Yoast SEO plugin, jQuery 1.11.0 and 3.7.1, Bootstrap 4+, Owl Carousel, Fancybox, AOS (Animate on Scroll), Borlabs Cookie plugin, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management via Borlabs Cookie
  • Google Tag Manager with consent mode
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar, Borlabs Cookie
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business and education software focused with clear service offerings.
  3. Strong presence of privacy and cookie compliance mechanisms.
  4. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools with consent management.
  5. No visible security policy or incident response contact found.
  6. WHOIS data consistent with website claims and location.
  7. Good branding and professional presentation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, Owl Carousel for sliders, and Borlabs Cookie for GDPR-compliant cookie management. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, with deferred loading of scripts and preloading of fonts. Mobile optimization is good with responsive menus and images. Accessibility is basic but present. The site integrates Google Tag Manager and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking, respecting user consent. Technical risks include use of older jQuery versions and missing security headers. Overall, the infrastructure is stable and professionally implemented with room for security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lansoftware.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lansoftware.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.