Skip to main content

Security report for landkreis-hof.de

Landkreis Hof · Government · Germany

High risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Landkreis Hof operates as a regional government authority serving over 95,000 residents across 27 municipalities in Germany. The website provides comprehensive administrative information and services, supporting local businesses and citizens. It maintains a solid market position as the official digital presence of the Landkreis Hof government, offering key services such as local governance, public announcements, and administrative support. The target audience includes residents, local enterprises, and visitors seeking regional information. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with the LayersWP theme and utilizes modern web technologies including jQuery and Google Analytics for performance and user insights. Hosting appears stable with Inttech nameservers, and the site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features, including a dedicated accessibility tool. SEO practices are well implemented with proper metadata and structured data. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with HSTS, employs IP anonymization in analytics, and offers user opt-out for tracking. Security headers are partially implemented, though improvements like a full Content-Security-Policy and a published security.txt file would enhance posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is strong with clear GDPR-aligned policies and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, Landkreis Hof's website is a trustworthy, professional government portal with good content quality, technical implementation, and privacy compliance. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response information, and maintaining regular security audits to sustain trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching landkreis-hof.de

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
65
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
68
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention landkreis-hof.de, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1
Employees
0
Customers
0
Third parties
1
Weak passwords
0%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for landkreis-hof.de.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Landkreis Hof is positioned as a key regional government entity providing essential public services and information to a medium-sized population and business community. Its business model focuses on governance and administrative support rather than commercial revenue streams. The website supports transparency and citizen engagement through accessible content and social media channels. The presence of over 6000 companies and 35,000 employees in the region indicates a vibrant local economy, which the government supports through infrastructure and services. The digital presence reflects a mature approach to public sector communication, leveraging modern CMS and accessibility tools. Partnerships with social media platforms and analytics providers support outreach and data-driven improvements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and HSTS enforcement, reducing risks of interception. Security headers like X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options are present, mitigating common web attacks. Google Analytics is configured with IP anonymization and opt-out options, respecting user privacy. No signs of exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries were found. However, the absence of a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy and a security.txt file limits transparency in vulnerability management. Incident response policies and dedicated security contact channels are not publicly documented, which could delay response to security events. Overall, the site balances usability and security well but should enhance transparency and proactive security disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate XSS and related attacks.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  3. Develop and publish an incident response policy and dedicated security contact information.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance user trust by providing transparency reports or security certifications.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Landkreis Hof
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Landkreis Hof
Description
Der Landkreis Hof ist ein schönes Stück Heimat. Zu ihm gehören 27 Städte und Gemeinden mit mehr als 95.000 Einwohnern. Mehr als 6000 Unternehmen haben 35.000 sozialversicherungspflichtig Beschäftigte. Über drei Autobahnen ist die Region bestens zu erreichen.
Key services
Administrative services, Information provision, Local governance, Public service announcements
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Google Analytics, Ajax Search Pro, LiteSpeed Cache
Frameworks
LayersWP
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced with HSTS
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics
  • Opt-out mechanism for tracking
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official regional government website for Landkreis Hof, Germany.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with LayersWP theme and several plugins.
  3. Implements GDPR-compliant privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanism.
  4. Includes accessibility tool for barrier-free access.
  5. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious content.
  6. Good SEO and social media integration.
  7. No explicit security incident response or vulnerability disclosure pages found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the LayersWP theme, supported by various plugins including Ajax Search Pro and LiteSpeed Cache for performance optimization. It uses jQuery and Google Analytics for interactivity and analytics. Hosting is likely provided by Inttech, as indicated by the nameservers. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility features such as a barrier-free access tool. Performance is moderate with caching and asynchronous script loading. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Technical risks are low but could be further reduced by tightening security headers and maintaining plugin updates.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with landkreis-hof.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review landkreis-hof.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.