Skip to main content

Security report for lamprecht.biz

Angela Lamprecht Fotografie · Other · Austria

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Angela Lamprecht Fotografie is a small professional photography business based in Austria, specializing in lifestyle, portrait, and interior photography. The website serves as a portfolio showcasing various photography projects with high-quality images. The business appears to be well-established, with a domain registered since 2009, consistent with the professional nature of the site. The target audience is general, including clients interested in professional photography services. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins, indicating a modern and maintainable infrastructure. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO practices, although some accessibility features could be improved. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS and has domain status protections to prevent unauthorized transfers or deletions. However, it lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended to enhance security posture. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR regulations. Contact information is not explicitly provided on the homepage, which may affect user trust and business credibility. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from adding privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and clear contact information to improve compliance, security, and user trust. There is no indication of malicious content or blocking mechanisms, and the site is safe for general audiences.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lamprecht.biz

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
50
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in a niche market of professional photography, focusing on lifestyle, portrait, and interior photography. Its market position is that of a specialized local photographer with a portfolio-driven business model. Revenue likely comes from commissioned photography projects. The website targets individuals and businesses seeking high-quality photographic services. The use of WordPress and Elementor suggests a cost-effective and flexible digital presence. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries. The business appears to maintain consistent branding and content quality, supporting a professional image. Growth indicators are not explicit but the domain age and recent content updates suggest ongoing activity.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. HTTPS is properly implemented, and domain registration includes transfer and deletion protections. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which limits readiness for handling security incidents. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Compliance gaps exist due to missing privacy and cookie policies, which are critical under GDPR. The site does not appear to use analytics or tracking scripts, reducing privacy risks but also limiting user behavior insights.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance browser security.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users about data handling.
  4. Provide clear contact information including email and phone number to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Establish an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email) to handle security issues effectively.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Angela Lamprecht Fotografie
Description
Lifestyle Portrait Interior Fotografie
Key services
Lifestyle photography, Portrait photography, Interior photography
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Elementor, Yoast SEO, Lightbox Photoswipe
Frameworks
Understrap (WordPress theme framework)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientTransferProhibited, clientDeleteProhibited, clientUpdateProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional photography portfolio for Angela Lamprecht
  2. Content is primarily image-based showcasing photography projects
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected
  5. Uses WordPress with Elementor and Yoast SEO plugins
  6. No explicit security headers detected in provided data
  7. HTTPS is enabled and active
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected
  9. No advertising or affiliate marketing detected
  10. Domain WHOIS data shows privacy protection but consistent with business
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Understrap theme framework and Elementor page builder, which provides a modern and flexible infrastructure. Yoast SEO plugin is used for search engine optimization, indicating attention to discoverability. The site loads moderate resources including jQuery and Lightbox Photoswipe for image galleries. Hosting appears stable with domain registrar Mesh Digital Limited and DNS hosted on domaincontrol.com (GoDaddy). Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility is basic and could be improved with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, which simplifies privacy compliance but limits marketing insights. Overall, the technical stack is standard for small professional portfolios but could benefit from security and compliance enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lamprecht.biz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lamprecht.biz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.