Skip to main content

Security report for lakecountyin.org

Lake County Government · Government · United States

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lake County Indiana Government operates an official website serving as the primary digital portal for residents, businesses, and visitors to access government services, departments, news, and events. The website reflects a large government entity with a comprehensive offering of public services and resources tailored to the local community. The site targets a broad audience including citizens, government employees, and local businesses. The business model is that of a public sector service provider with a focus on transparency and accessibility. Technically, the website employs a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 4, jQuery, Slick Carousel, and other JavaScript libraries, hosted behind Cloudflare DNS services. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features, demonstrating a moderate to good level of digital maturity. SEO and content structure are well implemented, supporting user navigation and information discovery. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and has domain transfer protections in place. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and there is a lack of security headers and explicit security or incident response policies published. No cookie consent mechanism was detected, which may impact privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with additional best practices. The overall risk assessment is low given the official nature of the site and consistent WHOIS data. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, implementing security headers, publishing security policies, and adding cookie consent to enhance privacy compliance and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lakecountyin.org

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
50
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Lake County Government holds a strong market position as the official county government entity for Lake County, Indiana. It benefits from a trusted .gov domain and provides a wide range of public services, including administration of justice, health, public safety, and community resources. The website supports transparency through news, events, and access to government documents. The target customer segments include local residents, businesses, and government employees. The partnership ecosystem includes links to state and local government agencies and educational institutions. Growth indicators include active news updates and event calendars. The business operates under a public service model with no commercial revenue streams evident.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protections. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents gaps that could be exploited in DNS spoofing or clickjacking attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Compliance gaps include missing cookie consent and lack of published security or incident response policies. The site does not provide a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file, limiting external security engagement. Overall, the security culture appears basic but functional, with room for improvement in transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.
  2. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with privacy regulations and improve user trust.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  5. Regularly review and update third-party libraries to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Lake County Government
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lake County Government
Description
Official website providing government information, services, departments, news, events, and resources for Lake County, Indiana.
Key services
Government information, Department directories, Public services, News and events, Online applications and payments
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4, Slick Carousel, FancyBox, Video.js, Chosen jQuery plugin, Google Fonts, FontAwesome 5, Google Analytics, Service Worker
Frameworks
Bootstrap 4
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status serverTransferProhibited
  • Use of Cloudflare DNS

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official government portal for Lake County, Indiana.
  2. Content is rich with government departments, services, news, and events.
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content.
  4. Good use of modern web technologies and accessibility features.
  5. Lacks explicit cookie consent mechanism and detailed privacy compliance features.
  6. WHOIS data is consistent and trustworthy.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a stable and modern infrastructure using Bootstrap 4 and popular JavaScript libraries like jQuery, Slick Carousel, and FancyBox. It uses Quest CMS, a specialized content management system for government sites. Hosting is supported by Cloudflare DNS services, providing DNS management and potential CDN benefits. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts and service worker registration for offline capabilities. The site is mobile responsive and includes accessibility features such as screen reader alerts and keyboard navigation aids. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which should be addressed to reduce attack surface.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lakecountyin.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lakecountyin.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.