Skip to main content

Security report for laisti.lv

laisti.lv · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

laisti.lv is a Latvian small business specializing in the installation and maintenance of high-quality automatic irrigation systems. The company offers services including installation with a 2-year warranty and post-installation maintenance, targeting residential and commercial customers seeking efficient watering solutions. Their market position is that of a local specialized service provider with a clear focus on quality and customer service. Technically, the website is hosted on the on.lv platform and employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized and presents content in Latvian with good navigation and professional design. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and secure forms but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. No vulnerabilities or suspicious content were detected. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, but the website content and business information appear consistent and legitimate. Overall, the site demonstrates a good balance of business credibility and technical implementation with room for security and privacy improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching laisti.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the niche market of irrigation system installation in Latvia, leveraging quality equipment such as Hunter brand sprinklers. Their business model is service-oriented, focusing on installation and maintenance with warranty offerings to build trust. The target audience includes homeowners and businesses interested in water-saving irrigation solutions. The presence of social media links and contact forms indicates an active customer engagement strategy. The company is registered as SIA "Akmeņdārzs" with a Latvian registration number, reinforcing legitimacy. The website's partnership with on.lv hosting suggests reliance on local infrastructure. Growth potential exists through enhanced digital marketing and expanded service offerings.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and secure form submissions, which are fundamental security practices. However, it lacks visible HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. The use of third-party tracking scripts introduces some privacy considerations, but cookie consent mechanisms are in place. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the content. Overall, the security posture is moderate, suitable for a small business but with opportunities for enhancement to meet higher compliance standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA "Akmeņdārzs"
Registration number
LV40003676563
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
laisti.lv
Description
Augstākās kvalitātes laistīšanas sistēmu ierīkošana
Key services
Automātiskās laistīšanas sistēmas ierīkošana ar 2 gadu garantiju, Automātiskās laistīšanas sistēmas ierīkošana ar pēcapkalpošanu, Automātiskās laistīšanas sistēmas ierīkošana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, WebFont Loader, jQuery (implied by script naming conventions), SVG graphics
Platforms
on.lv hosting platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced (implied by og:url https)
  • No visible sensitive data exposure
  • Use of secure forms with POST method

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Latvian language targeting local customers.
  3. Clear contact information and multiple contact methods are provided.
  4. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools is evident.
  5. No security policy or incident response information is published.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit; no registrar or domain age info.
  7. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  8. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  9. Social media presence limited to Facebook and Instagram.
  10. Forms collect personal data including name, email, phone, and message.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including asynchronous loading of Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel scripts. It uses SVG graphics for icons and Google Fonts for typography, contributing to a visually appealing and responsive design. The hosting is provided by on.lv, a Latvian hosting provider, which aligns with the local business focus. Performance appears moderate with no obvious delays or errors in the HTML content. The site includes multiple contact forms collecting personal data securely via POST methods. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no evidence of a CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a small business website with potential for further optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with laisti.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review laisti.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.