Skip to main content

Security report for lagonda.lv

SIA “LAGONDA” · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA “LAGONDA” is a small Latvian company specializing in the sale of wood products including firewood, logs, boards, and pallets. The website is primarily in Russian, targeting local customers in Latvia. The company provides clear contact information including phone numbers, email, and a physical address in Daugavpils. The business model focuses on direct sales of wood materials at competitive prices. The website content is basic but functional, with moderate branding consistency and navigation clarity. Technically, the website uses a range of common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Slick Carousel, Select2, and Moment.js, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site includes cookie consent mechanisms but lacks visible privacy or terms of service pages. Performance and mobile optimization are basic, with no advanced CMS or hosting details identified. Security headers and advanced security measures are not evident, and WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting full domain legitimacy verification. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but no explicit security headers or policies published. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the provided content, but improvements are recommended in security headers, CSRF protection, and privacy policy publication. Overall, the site presents a low to moderate risk profile but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance transparency. Strategic recommendations include implementing comprehensive privacy and security policies, improving technical security controls, verifying domain registration details, and enhancing website content quality and SEO to strengthen business credibility and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Cloudflare

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lagonda.lv

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
95
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the wood products sector serving the Latvian market, primarily Russian-speaking customers. It appears to be a small business with a straightforward sales model focused on physical goods. The presence of a local registration number and physical address supports legitimacy. The website lacks advanced e-commerce or digital marketing features, indicating a traditional business approach. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified. The company could improve market positioning by enhancing online presence, adding certifications, and expanding digital marketing efforts.

Security posture

The current security posture is basic. HTTPS is used, but no security headers such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected. Forms do not show explicit CSRF tokens or advanced input validation. Cookie consent is implemented, but no privacy or security policies are published. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification. There is no evidence of incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The site would benefit from adopting security best practices, publishing compliance documentation, and conducting regular security audits.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Ensure all forms have CSRF protection and input validation.
  4. Obtain and verify WHOIS data to confirm domain legitimacy and update registration details.
  5. Enhance website content quality, SEO, and mobile optimization to improve user experience and trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA “LAGONDA”
Registration number
LV41503041849
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA “LAGONDA”
Description
Компания предлагает дрова, брёвна, доски, паллеты по выгодной цене. Основной адрес: Vidzemes iela 69a-1, LV-5422, Daugavpils, Latvija. Регистрационный номер: LV41503041849.
Key services
Продажа дров, Продажа брёвен, Продажа досок, Продажа паллет
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Slick Carousel, Select2, Moment.js, daterangepicker, toastr.js, Air Datepicker, remodal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage implied by canonical link (https://lagonda.lv)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
toastr.js
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is in Russian language targeting Latvian market
  2. Content is business focused on wood products
  3. No privacy or terms of service pages found
  4. Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  5. No visible social media links
  6. No security policy or incident response information published
  7. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  8. Use of common JS libraries and plugins
  9. No advanced SEO or accessibility features detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a traditional tech stack with jQuery and several popular plugins for UI components and date handling. No modern frameworks or CMS platforms were detected. The site loads external CSS and JS from reputable CDNs. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization indicators. Accessibility features are minimal. The site uses HTTPS but lacks advanced security headers. There is no evidence of server-side technologies or hosting provider information. Technical debt appears moderate with opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lagonda.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lagonda.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.