Skip to main content

Security report for laendleanzeiger.at

laendleanzeiger.at · E-commerce · Austria

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Laendleanzeiger.at is a regional online classifieds platform focused on the Vorarlberg region in Austria, offering free classified ads for buying and selling goods. The website targets local users seeking a convenient marketplace and positions itself as a significant regional classifieds hub. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including JavaScript frameworks, Cookiebot for consent management, and Google Tag Manager for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and implements HTTPS with basic security measures such as CSRF protection cookies. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data and lack of explicit privacy policy or contact information pages reduce overall trust and business credibility. The site uses multiple advertising and tracking services with transparent consent mechanisms, reflecting good privacy compliance practices. Overall, the website is professionally designed and safe for general audiences but would benefit from improved transparency and domain registration clarity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching laendleanzeiger.at

This scan found 19 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the e-commerce sector as a classifieds marketplace serving a regional audience in Austria. Its business model revolves around providing a free platform for users to post and browse classified ads, generating revenue likely through advertising partnerships with networks such as The Moneytizer and Meta Platforms. The presence of extensive tracking and advertising tools suggests monetization through targeted ads. The platform's competitive advantage lies in its regional focus and free service offering. The lack of detailed company information and contact data limits deeper insights into organizational structure or growth indicators. Partnerships with major ad networks and consent management providers indicate a mature advertising ecosystem. Strategic observations include the need for enhanced transparency and domain legitimacy to strengthen market trust.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enforced and the presence of CSRF protection mechanisms. Cookie consent management is implemented via Cookiebot, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options is a gap that could be exploited. No vulnerability disclosure or security policy information is provided, which limits incident response readiness. The lack of WHOIS data and domain registration transparency is a concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in headers, policies, and transparency to enhance resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy page accessible from the homepage.
  2. Add explicit security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen browser security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including company email and phone numbers for user support and compliance.
  4. Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to improve incident response readiness.
  5. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available to enhance trust and legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
laendleanzeiger.at
Description
Kostenlose Kleinanzeigen für Vorarlberg. Kaufen und verkaufen auf Laendleanzeiger.at - dem großen Kleinanzeigenmarkt!
Key services
Free classified ads posting, Buying and selling marketplace
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Cookiebot CMP, Google Tag Manager, INFOnline Measurement Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent management implemented
  • CSRF protection cookie (__RequestVerificationToken)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Cxense, INFOnline Measurement Manager
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
The Moneytizer, Meta Platforms, Inc., Cxense, Emetriq
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot, Cxense, The Moneytizer
Marketing tools
Cookiebot CMP
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a regional classifieds marketplace targeting Vorarlberg, Austria.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms are implemented well.
  4. No explicit contact information or privacy policy page found in the HTML content.
  5. Multiple third-party ad and tracking services are used, with transparent consent management.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
  7. HTTPS is enforced and CSRF protection cookie is present.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  9. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based front end with integrations for consent management (Cookiebot), analytics (Google Tag Manager, INFOnline Measurement Manager), and multiple advertising networks. The site is mobile-optimized and includes meta tags for SEO and social media verification. No CMS or hosting provider information is explicitly detected. Performance appears moderate with preloading of key scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. The absence of some security headers and lack of structured data beyond meta tags suggest opportunities for technical enhancement. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business model but could benefit from improved security and transparency features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with laendleanzeiger.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review laendleanzeiger.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.