Skip to main content

Security report for lacetolove.com

Lace To Love · E-commerce · N/a

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Lace To Love is a specialized e-commerce retailer focusing on lace fabrics, silk, feather fringes, tulle, ribbons, and a range of clothing items. Established in 2015, the company targets consumers and businesses seeking high-quality luxury fabrics and related apparel, offering worldwide shipping. The website is built on WordPress with WooCommerce, integrating modern technologies such as jQuery, FontAwesome, and various plugins for payment and social media feeds. The technical infrastructure is solid with Cloudflare DNS and CDN usage, though some security enhancements like DNSSEC and security headers could be improved. The security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks explicit security policies and incident response contacts. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no visible privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy e-commerce platform with a good user experience and strong business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching lacetolove.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the niche luxury fabric and clothing market, leveraging an e-commerce model to reach a global audience. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized product offerings and positive customer reviews. The business model is retail-focused with potential wholesale elements. Marketing and advertising are supported by Google Ads, Facebook Pixel, and Mailchimp integrations, indicating active customer engagement and remarketing strategies. The partnership with MakeCommerce for payment processing is a critical component of its operational ecosystem. Growth indicators include active social media presence and regular new product arrivals. The company appears to be a small-sized enterprise with consistent branding and a clear market position.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly implemented, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML source. However, the absence of DNSSEC and lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represent areas for improvement. There is no publicly available security policy or incident response contact information, which could hinder effective vulnerability management and customer trust in case of incidents. The cookie consent mechanism indicates some GDPR compliance awareness, but the lack of a privacy policy page is a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small e-commerce site but would benefit from enhanced security controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and customer trust.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.
  3. Implement and verify security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  4. Establish and publish a security policy and incident response contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Lace To Love
Description
Welcome to lace fabrics online shop Lace To Love. All lace fabrics are in stock and will be shipped immediately. Worldwide delivery
Key services
Online sale of lace fabrics, Silk fabrics, Feather fringes, Tulle fabrics, Ribbons
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, FontAwesome, Slick Carousel, MakeCommerce payment gateway, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Instagram Feed plugin
Frameworks
WooCommerce
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by cookie consent and WooCommerce)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Google Site Kit, Mailchimp
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional e-commerce platform specializing in lace and luxury fabrics.
  2. Content is rich with product listings, customer reviews, and social media integration.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages were detected in the provided content.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented indicating GDPR awareness.
  5. Security headers could be improved and DNSSEC is not enabled.
  6. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and domain age is appropriate.
  7. No signs of WAF blocking or content restrictions.
  8. No explicit or adult content detected; content is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a mature WordPress and WooCommerce platform, utilizing a variety of plugins for payment processing, search, Instagram feeds, and marketing integrations. The use of Cloudflare DNS and CDN suggests a focus on performance and availability. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with some reliance on external CDNs and scripts. Accessibility is basic but present. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and missing security headers. Opportunities exist to modernize security configurations and improve privacy compliance to align with best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with lacetolove.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review lacetolove.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.