Skip to main content

Security report for labour-int.eu

Aruba S.p.A. · Government · Italy

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Labour-INT is a European Union-funded project focused on promoting the inclusion of asylum-seekers and refugees into the European labour market through multi-stakeholder cooperation involving businesses, chambers of commerce, trade unions, and migrant associations. The project operates pilot actions, capacity building, and advocacy to facilitate integration paths from arrival to workplace. The website serves as an information and dissemination platform for the project, showcasing events, partners, and resources. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 5.0.22 with common plugins such as SiteOrigin Panels and MetaSlider. It is hosted by Aruba S.p.A., a known hosting provider. However, the site lacks HTTPS, uses outdated JavaScript libraries, and has limited performance and accessibility optimizations. The site is mobile responsive at a basic level and has a clear navigation structure. From a security perspective, the absence of a valid SSL/TLS certificate is a critical vulnerability, exposing users to potential data interception. No security headers or advanced protections are implemented. Privacy compliance is weak, with no visible privacy or cookie policies and no consent mechanisms despite the presence of tracking scripts. Contact information is limited to emails associated with the ETUC domain, a key project partner. Overall, the site is functional and informative but requires urgent improvements in security and privacy compliance to protect users and align with EU regulations. Strategic recommendations include enabling HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, updating technical components, and enhancing security headers and practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching labour-int.eu

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Labour-INT occupies a niche in the EU non-profit sector focused on migrant labour market integration. Its competitive advantage lies in its multi-stakeholder approach and strong partnerships with recognized European organizations such as ETUC, ILO, Eurochambres, and OSCE. The project is funded by the EU Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, indicating stable financial backing. The target customers are migrants, refugees, and organizations involved in integration efforts. The website supports growth by disseminating project results and facilitating networking. The partnership ecosystem is broad and credible, enhancing the project's legitimacy and reach.

Security posture

The current security posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS, absence of security headers, and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The site does not implement GDPR-required privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance risk. The use of outdated libraries may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. No data protection officer or security contact information is provided. The presence of a tracking script without consent mechanisms further weakens privacy compliance. Incident response readiness appears minimal or undocumented.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Develop and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to the latest secure versions.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy including security contact channels.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS version 5.0.22 with plugins including SiteOrigin Panels, MetaSlider, and YouTube Embed Plus. The JavaScript stack includes jQuery 1.12.4, which is outdated and may pose security risks. Hosting is provided by Aruba S.p.A., a reputable provider. Performance metrics are poor or unavailable, indicating slow loading times. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. SEO is basic with meta tags and canonical links present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal. The site uses HTTP only, which is a major technical and security deficiency.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with labour-int.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review labour-int.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.