Skip to main content

Security report for kyoceramobile.com

Kyocera Mobile · Technology · N/a

High risk. 6 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kyocera Mobile operates as a provider of ultra-rugged mobile devices designed for industries where durability and reliability are critical. The company positions itself as a specialist in connectivity and productivity solutions through ruggedized phones. The website reflects a professional business presence with clear branding and targeted messaging towards industrial and enterprise customers. Technically, the site employs modern JavaScript libraries, analytics tools, and a service worker for enhanced performance and user experience. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, though explicit privacy and terms of service documents are not clearly found. The absence of WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty about domain registration legitimacy, but the overall digital footprint suggests a legitimate enterprise. Strategic recommendations include improving transparency with clear privacy and security policies and providing direct contact information for enhanced trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: SMB

      Port 445 (SMB) is publicly accessible - SMB - Windows file sharing, high risk

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to SMB using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kyoceramobile.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
88
Average
53
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kyocera Mobile targets niche industrial sectors requiring rugged mobile devices, leveraging its brand reputation for durability. The business model focuses on manufacturing and selling specialized mobile phones with a focus on connectivity and reliability. The website's content and structure support a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and a clear value proposition. The use of multiple analytics and marketing tools indicates an active digital marketing strategy. However, the lack of explicit corporate contact details and WHOIS data suggests areas for improvement in corporate transparency. The company appears to maintain a moderate market position within the rugged mobile device industry, with potential for growth through enhanced digital presence and compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. The use of service workers and modern JavaScript libraries suggests a contemporary technical approach. However, the absence of explicit security headers and visible security or incident response policies limits the security maturity level. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The lack of WHOIS data and contact information for security incidents reduces the ability to fully assess risk. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced transparency and implementation of additional security best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for general and security inquiries.
  4. Implement a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kyocera Mobile
Description
Kyocera ultra-rugged devices survive and thrive wherever you take them. The perfect phone for industries where the unexpected happens.
Key services
ultra-rugged mobile devices, connectivity solutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Vibe Analytics, Service Worker
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service Worker registered
  • Cookie consent implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Vibe Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Vibe Analytics
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Vibe Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. No WHOIS data available, domain registration status unclear
  3. Privacy and terms policies not explicitly found
  4. Cookie consent implemented with high confidence
  5. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in content
  6. Uses multiple tracking and analytics services
  7. Content is professional and business-focused on rugged mobile devices
  8. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including asynchronous JavaScript loading, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, and Vibe Analytics for marketing and analytics purposes. It employs a service worker for offline capabilities and performance improvements. Hosting appears to leverage AWS Cloudfront CDN for content delivery. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with proper meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for search engines. Accessibility features are basic but present. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in CSS loading and script management. No CMS was explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional business website with opportunities for further optimization and security enhancements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kyoceramobile.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kyoceramobile.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.