Skip to main content

Security report for kyberturvallisuuskeskus.fi

Liikenne- ja viestintävirasto Traficom · Government · Finland

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kyberturvallisuuskeskus, operated by the Finnish Transport and Communications Agency Traficom, is a government cybersecurity center focused on developing and overseeing the operational reliability and security of communication networks and services in Finland. It provides cybersecurity situational awareness, vulnerability disclosures, and guidance to both individuals and organizations. The website is well-maintained, professionally designed, and regularly updated with relevant cybersecurity news and alerts. The organization holds a strong market position as the national authority for cybersecurity under the Finnish government. Technically, the website leverages modern web technologies including React and Apollo GraphQL, with performance optimizations and mobile responsiveness. It uses Matomo for analytics, ensuring privacy compliance with GDPR. The domain is secured with HTTPS and DNSSEC, and the WHOIS data confirms the domain is registered to the official government agency, reinforcing trust and legitimacy. Security posture is robust with no detected vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The site provides comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms. However, explicit security headers could be more visible, and a security.txt file for vulnerability reporting is recommended. Overall, the site demonstrates a mature security culture and strong compliance with regulatory requirements. The risk assessment indicates a low risk profile with strong trust indicators. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security header implementation, publishing a security.txt file, and continuous monitoring of third-party scripts. These measures will further strengthen the site's security and trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
43/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kyberturvallisuuskeskus.fi

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
43
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kyberturvallisuuskeskus.fi, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kyberturvallisuuskeskus.fi right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kyberturvallisuuskeskus operates as a government entity providing essential cybersecurity services to Finland's communication infrastructure. Its competitive advantage lies in its official mandate and integration within Traficom, enabling authoritative guidance and coordination. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on cybersecurity monitoring, incident response, and regulatory oversight. Revenue streams are government-funded. The target customers include public sector entities, critical infrastructure operators, and the general public. Growth indicators include active vulnerability disclosures and engagement in EU cybersecurity initiatives. The partnership ecosystem includes EU bodies and technology vendors. Strategic observations highlight the center's role in national cybersecurity resilience and public awareness.

Security posture

The website exhibits a high level of security maturity with enforced HTTPS, DNSSEC, and no visible vulnerabilities. The presence of regular vulnerability disclosures and alerts indicates proactive security management. Compliance with GDPR and NIS2 directives is evident through privacy policies and regulatory content. Incident response readiness is implied but not explicitly detailed on the site. Data protection practices are aligned with government standards. The security culture is strong, supported by transparent communication and official social media channels. No critical security gaps were identified, though improvements in security header visibility and vulnerability reporting mechanisms are suggested.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly publish comprehensive security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve incident response communication.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Enhance visibility of incident response procedures and contact channels for security incidents.
  5. Maintain and expand user education and awareness initiatives to strengthen cybersecurity culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Liikenne- ja viestintävirasto Traficom
Registration number
2924753-3
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Liikenne- ja viestintävirasto Traficom
Description
Kyberturvallisuuskeskus kehittää ja valvoo viestintäverkkojen ja -palveluiden toimintavarmuutta ja turvallisuutta. Tuotamme kyberturvallisuuden tilannekuvaa.
Key services
Cybersecurity monitoring and alerts, Vulnerability disclosures, Guidance and instructions for individuals and organizations, Incident reporting, Regulatory oversight and coordination
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (data-react-helmet), Webpack, Apollo GraphQL, Matomo Analytics, Custom fonts (Montserrat, Open Sans)
Frameworks
React
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC signed domain
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No vulnerable libraries detected
  • Secure forms with no suspicious inputs

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is rich, updated, and relevant to cybersecurity.
  3. Strong government affiliation and trust signals.
  4. Good privacy and cookie policy implementation with consent mechanisms.
  5. No signs of suspicious or malicious activity.
  6. Social media presence is official and consistent.
  7. Technical implementation uses modern frameworks and analytics.
  8. Security posture is strong with HTTPS and DNSSEC.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React framework with Apollo GraphQL for data management, indicating a contemporary and scalable architecture. It uses custom fonts and optimized images for performance and accessibility. Matomo analytics is employed for privacy-conscious user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. Hosting appears to be managed by Finnish government infrastructure, ensuring reliability and compliance. Performance is fast with no blocking content detected. Technical risks are minimal, with opportunities for modernization focused on enhanced security headers and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kyberturvallisuuskeskus.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kyberturvallisuuskeskus.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.