Skip to main content

Security report for kvgportal.com

The Kverneland Group · Manufacturing · N/a

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Kverneland Group's website at kvgportal.com currently serves as a simple notification page informing partners that the partner portal has moved to a new URL. The content is minimal and primarily targeted at existing partners, providing multilingual links and instructions to update bookmarks. The business is positioned as a manufacturing entity with a partner network, but the website itself does not provide detailed business information or services beyond portal access guidance. Technically, the site is hosted on an Apache server with basic DNS configuration but lacks a valid SSL certificate and modern TLS support, resulting in an insecure HTTP-only connection. Security headers are partially implemented but insufficient to ensure robust security. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are present, and no contact information or forms are available on the site. Overall, the website's digital maturity is low, with poor SEO, accessibility, and performance characteristics. The security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and lack of DNSSEC. The domain registration appears consistent and legitimate, but the absence of critical security controls and policies poses risks. Strategic improvements in SSL deployment, security headers, and privacy compliance are recommended to enhance trust and security.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kvgportal.com

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
40
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Kverneland Group operates in the manufacturing sector with a partner-focused business model. The website indicates a structured partner ecosystem requiring secure portal access. However, the current site is limited to redirecting partners to a new portal URL, suggesting a transition or upgrade in digital services. The lack of detailed business content or contact information limits external engagement and transparency. The company likely relies on direct partner communications and localized sales support. There is no evidence of e-commerce or public-facing customer services on this domain. The business model centers on B2B relationships and partner collaboration. Growth indicators or revenue streams are not discernible from the site. The multilingual support hints at an international presence. The domain and hosting setup suggest a medium to large enterprise with established infrastructure but needing modernization in web security and compliance.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently poor. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and TLS support means all traffic is unencrypted, exposing users to interception risks. Although some security headers like HSTS are present, they are ineffective without HTTPS. DNSSEC and CAA records are not implemented, reducing domain-level security. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies are published, indicating low security transparency. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also suggests non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No analytics or tracking scripts reduce privacy risks but also limit monitoring capabilities. Overall, the site is vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks and lacks basic security hygiene. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS and policy publication is critical to reduce risk and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS and secure all communications.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or 1.3) and configure strong cipher suites to protect data in transit.
  3. Implement DNSSEC and CAA records to enhance domain security and prevent certificate mis-issuance.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  5. Add contact information and security incident response details to improve transparency and trust.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on an Apache server with DNS managed by domainnetwork.se. The DNS configuration includes an SPF record that disallows all sending (-all), indicating no authorized mail servers, which may affect email deliverability. The site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support any TLS versions, resulting in insecure HTTP-only access. Security headers such as HSTS are present but ineffective without HTTPS. No CMS or advanced frameworks are detected; the site appears to be a static HTML page with minimal content. Performance metrics are unavailable, but the lack of resources and content suggests slow or minimal loading. The site is not optimized for SEO or accessibility, with no meta tags or structured data present. Multilingual links exist but lead to presumably similar static pages. Overall, the technical infrastructure is basic and requires modernization to meet current web standards and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kvgportal.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kvgportal.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.