Skip to main content

Security report for kvernelandgroup.com

Kverneland Group · Manufacturing · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

35/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kverneland Group is a prominent international enterprise specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of agricultural implements, electronic solutions, and digital farming services. The website reflects a well-established brand with a clear focus on agricultural professionals and partners, offering extensive content about products, news, and events. The company maintains multiple regional subdomains and partner portals, indicating a broad market presence. Technically, the site is built on a legacy CMS (eZ Publish) and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel, alongside a robust cookie consent mechanism. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of DNS records represent significant security and configuration gaps. Security headers are partially implemented, but the lack of HTTPS severely impacts the site's security posture. Privacy compliance is well addressed with clear policies and consent management. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate digital maturity but requires urgent improvements in security infrastructure to align with enterprise standards.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kvernelandgroup.com

This scan found 4 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
50
DNS health
50
Network security
40
Average
35

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kverneland Group operates in the manufacturing and transportation sectors, focusing on agricultural machinery and digital farming solutions. The business model centers on product innovation, distribution, and digital services, targeting farmers, distributors, and agricultural professionals globally. The presence of multiple language-specific subdomains and partner portals suggests a decentralized but coordinated global strategy. The company leverages analytics and marketing tools to engage its audience and optimize user experience. Despite strong branding and content quality, technical debt from legacy CMS and missing DNS configurations may pose operational risks. The company appears to have a solid partnership ecosystem, including career and documentation portals, enhancing its market reach and service delivery.

Security posture

The website's security posture is currently weak due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support, exposing users to potential data interception risks. While some security headers like HSTS and Referrer-Policy are present, their effectiveness is negated without proper TLS implementation. The lack of DNSSEC and CAA records further reduces domain security. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The use of modern analytics and marketing scripts is balanced by a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and DNS configuration is critical to improve security and trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Configure DNS records properly, including A, AAAA, MX, NS, DNSSEC, and CAA to enhance domain security and reliability.
  3. Implement additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  4. Publish explicit security policies and incident response contacts to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Continue maintaining and enhancing privacy compliance mechanisms, including clear cookie consent and GDPR adherence.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by the legacy eZ Publish CMS, which may limit modernization and scalability. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools, including Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Hotjar, ClickDimensions, and Facebook Pixel, managed via a cookie consent framework (tarteaucitron). The site lacks performance data, but the presence of cached CSS and JS files suggests some optimization. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. The absence of HTTPS and missing DNS records represent critical technical risks. Modernizing the CMS and improving infrastructure would enhance performance, security, and maintainability.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kvernelandgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kvernelandgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.