Skip to main content

Security report for kutululu.cz

studio KUTULULU, s. r. o. · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Studio KUTULULU, s. r. o. is a small Czech graphic design studio specializing in branding, web design, and related creative services. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and targets a general audience primarily in the Czech Republic. The business presents itself clearly with contact details and a portfolio of projects, indicating a niche local market position. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks like Bootstrap and uses popular plugins for SEO, multilingual support, and GDPR compliance. The site is mobile optimized and performs moderately well. From a security perspective, the website enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms compliant with GDPR. It uses Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics for marketing and analytics, reflecting moderate user tracking. However, no explicit security policies or incident response information are published, and no WHOIS data is available due to privacy protection or domain registration issues. Despite this, the site shows no signs of malicious activity or vulnerabilities in the visible content. Overall, the website demonstrates a good security posture with room for improvement in publishing security policies and adding security headers. The business credibility is supported by clear contact information and professional presentation. The lack of WHOIS data slightly reduces trust but is common for small businesses. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response info, and maintaining regular audits of third-party scripts.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kutululu.cz

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
75
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates as a small graphic design studio focused on creative services such as branding and web design. Its market positioning is local and niche, targeting clients in the Czech Republic. The business model is service-based, relying on project work showcased in the portfolio. The presence of multilingual support indicates an intent to reach broader audiences. The company uses standard digital marketing tools and analytics to support growth. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The company registration number is provided, enhancing legitimacy. The website content and structure suggest a stable operation with consistent branding and professional communication channels.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. Cookie consent is managed via a GDPR-compliant plugin, and tracking is transparent with Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics scripts loaded with consent. No security headers were detected, which is a potential area for improvement. The contact form uses Contact Form 7, a widely used plugin, but no explicit anti-spam or security measures are visible in the HTML. No security or incident response policies are published, which limits transparency. The absence of WHOIS data is noted but likely due to privacy protection rather than malicious intent. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding security headers, publishing policies, and implementing vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection.
  2. Publish a security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security communication.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party plugins and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Maintain and document data retention policies and privacy compliance measures to align with GDPR and other regulations.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
studio KUTULULU, s. r. o.
Registration number
05768845
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
studio KUTULULU, s. r. o.
Description
grafické studio
Key services
graphic design, branding, web design
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, jQuery, Bootstrap, Featherlight, Anime.js, Contact Form 7, Complianz GDPR plugin, WPML (multilingual)
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data
  • Secure contact form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech language with multilingual support.
  3. Comprehensive cookie and privacy policies are implemented with consent management.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, physical address, and contact form.
  5. No security policy or incident response information publicly available.
  6. No WHOIS data available from CZ NIC, likely due to privacy protection or domain not registered.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  8. Facebook Pixel and Google Analytics used for marketing and analytics.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for scripting, and several plugins for SEO (Yoast), multilingual support (WPML), GDPR compliance (Complianz), and contact forms (Contact Form 7). The site loads external scripts for analytics and marketing, including Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site uses canonical and hreflang tags for SEO and has structured data in JSON-LD format for enhanced search engine understanding. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid with opportunities to improve security headers and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kutululu.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kutululu.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.