Skip to main content

Security report for kustibapar.lv

Kustība "Par!" · Government · Latvia

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kustība "Par!" is a Latvian social liberal political movement advocating for a just and modern Latvia within a united Europe. The website serves as a platform for political advocacy, public engagement, and dissemination of their program and news. The organization appears to be small but active, with local government representation and a clear political agenda. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and frameworks such as Elementor and Bootstrap, and it integrates multiple analytics and tracking tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar. The site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts its privacy compliance score. Security headers are not detected, suggesting room for improvement in security hardening. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, with consistent branding and active social media presence, but could enhance compliance and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kustibapar.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The political movement targets Latvian citizens interested in social liberal governance and reforms. Its business model revolves around political advocacy, membership engagement, and fundraising. The site positions itself as a credible political entity with affiliations to European liberal organizations (ALDE). The presence of news updates and program details indicates ongoing activity and engagement. The lack of explicit contact information on the homepage may limit direct communication but social media channels are active. The use of modern web technologies and analytics tools suggests a moderate level of digital maturity. The organization is likely small in size but maintains a professional online presence.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses anonymized IP tracking in Google Analytics, which are positive security practices. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site lacks a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could hinder coordinated vulnerability reporting. The use of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and necessitates regular security audits. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved by implementing recommended headers, privacy policies, and incident response mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to comply with standards and improve user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kustība "Par!"
Description
Sociāli liberāla Kustība par Latviju, kura ir iespēja visiem, par valsti, kas nepieder dažiem un par tautu, kas sastāv no daudziem.
Key services
Political advocacy, Public information dissemination, Membership engagement, Fundraising
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, PHP, jQuery 3.3.1, Bootstrap, FontAwesome, Slick Carousel, Elementor, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Frameworks
Bootstrap, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel with anonymize IP enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a political movement site for Kustība "Par!" in Latvia
  2. Content is in Latvian with some English metadata
  3. No visible privacy or cookie policy pages found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly listed on homepage
  5. Uses multiple tracking and analytics services without visible consent mechanism
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, indicating privacy protection or rate limiting
  7. No signs of malware or phishing detected
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found
  9. Site uses modern WordPress CMS with popular plugins and themes
  10. Social media links to Facebook, Twitter, Instagram present and active
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.6.2 using Elementor and Bootstrap frameworks, indicating a modern and flexible CMS environment. It uses jQuery 3.3.1 and Slick Carousel for UI components. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and icons from FontAwesome. Analytics and marketing tools include Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Hotjar, which provide extensive user behavior tracking. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. The site lacks advanced security headers and visible privacy compliance mechanisms. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the HTML content. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional political website but requires enhancements in security and privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kustibapar.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kustibapar.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.