Skip to main content

Security report for kunstmaan.be

Accenture · Technology · N/a

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

90/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Accenture is a global professional services company specializing in consulting, technology, and digital transformation services. The website analyzed represents a service page under the Accenture Song brand, showcasing their capabilities to help clients meet evolving customer needs. The site is well-branded, professionally designed, and targets business clients and professionals. The technical infrastructure leverages Adobe Experience Manager CMS and Adobe's marketing and analytics technologies, indicating a mature digital presence. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms, but lacks explicit security headers and visible security policies. Privacy compliance is partially demonstrated through cookie consent but lacks visible privacy and terms of service documentation on this page. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, though SEO is limited by noindex directives.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • Medium

      Missing Permissions-Policy header

      Controls browser features and APIs

      What to do: Implement a Permissions-Policy to restrict feature access

      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Permissions-Policy: accelerometer=(), autoplay=(), camera=(), cross-origin-isolated=(),…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • Medium

      DNSSEC Not Enabled

      DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

      What to do: Enable DNSSEC to prevent DNS spoofing attacks

      • CAPEC-142
      • RFC 4033
      • RFC 4035

Keep watching kunstmaan.be

This scan found 12 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
90

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kunstmaan.be, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
9
Employees
0
Customers
9
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
67%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for kunstmaan.be.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Accenture holds a strong market position as a leading global consulting and technology services provider. Their business model focuses on delivering a broad range of services including cloud, cybersecurity, AI, digital engineering, and more. The website reflects a comprehensive service portfolio and a sophisticated marketing ecosystem using Adobe tools. The target customer segments are enterprises seeking digital transformation and innovation. The company demonstrates strong branding consistency and trust indicators, though direct contact information and regulatory disclosures are not present on this page. The absence of WHOIS data is likely due to registry privacy policies rather than suspicious activity.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS and integrates a cookie consent mechanism, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. No forms or input fields were detected on this page, minimizing attack surface. The site does not expose sensitive data or use outdated libraries based on the scripts observed. Security score is moderate with recommendations to enhance header configurations and publish security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  2. Publish clear privacy policy and terms of service documents accessible from all pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection officer to enhance incident response readiness.
  4. Review and adjust meta robots tags to allow indexing of key pages for better SEO and discoverability.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to maintain a strong security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Accenture
Description
Accenture shows how we can more effectively help our clients serve the ever-evolving needs of their customers as a single united collective.
Key services
Cloud, Cybersecurity, Data and Artificial Intelligence, Digital Engineering and Manufacturing, Emerging Technology, Ecosystem Partners, Finance and Risk Management, Infrastructure and Capital Projects, Learning, Marketing and Experience
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Adobe Helix RUM, jQuery, OneTrust Cookie Consent, Adobe DTM Reactor, Adobe Test & Target, Adobe Personalization
Frameworks
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Adobe Analytics, Clicktale
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Clicktale
Tracking pixels
Adobe DTM, Adobe Target, Everest, Demdex, Vidyard
Marketing tools
Adobe Experience Manager, OneTrust Cookie Consent
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No WHOIS data available from raw output, possibly due to registry restrictions
  3. Cookie consent mechanism implemented with OneTrust
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on this page
  5. No privacy policy or terms of service links detected on this page
  6. SEO meta robots tag set to noindex,nofollow, limiting search engine indexing
  7. Use of Adobe Experience Manager CMS and Adobe marketing/analytics stack
  8. No security headers explicitly detected in HTML content
  9. No forms detected on this page
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack centered on Adobe Experience Manager CMS and Adobe marketing/analytics tools. JavaScript libraries include jQuery and Adobe Helix RUM for performance monitoring. Cookie consent is managed via OneTrust. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. SEO is partially implemented but limited by noindex meta tags. No broken elements or errors were detected in the HTML content. Hosting provider details are not explicitly available. Overall, the technical implementation is robust but can be improved with enhanced SEO and security header configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kunstmaan.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kunstmaan.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.