Skip to main content

Security report for kuhnodice.com

KuhnOdice Germany GmbH · Manufacturing · Germany

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KuhnOdice Germany GmbH is a specialized manufacturer and solution provider in the passive fire protection industry, serving sectors such as glazing, doors, battery safety, transport, and mobility. The company offers a broad portfolio of fire protection materials and services including fire tests, individual manufacturing, and tailor-made fire protection boards. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a professional digital presence, leveraging WordPress CMS and modern web technologies. The technical infrastructure is robust, featuring SEO optimization, mobile responsiveness, and cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, bot protection via hCaptcha, and privacy-conscious analytics setup. However, the absence of explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and security incident response information represents areas for improvement. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-branded, and targeted at industrial B2B clients.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kuhnodice.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
85
Email security
73
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
53
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kuhnodice.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for kuhnodice.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KuhnOdice positions itself as a niche leader in fire protection materials with a focus on industrial applications. Its competitive advantage lies in offering certified, high-performance materials under strong brand names and serving multiple industries including transportation and energy. The business model is B2B manufacturing with a focus on customized solutions. The company maintains an active social media presence and provides extensive product catalogues and technical resources. Growth indicators include recent domain registration aligned with company founding and a comprehensive digital marketing approach. Partnerships and certifications are implied but not explicitly detailed on the website.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, use of UserCentrics for cookie consent, and hCaptcha integration to mitigate automated abuse. Google Tag Manager is configured with default denied consent for ads and analytics, reflecting privacy-conscious practices. However, the lack of security headers and absence of published security policies or incident response contacts indicate gaps in transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The site would benefit from implementing DNSSEC, security.txt, and explicit vulnerability disclosure to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service accessible from the main navigation.
  2. Implement and publish a security policy including incident response contact information.
  3. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and trust.
  4. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Create a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
KuhnOdice Germany GmbH
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KuhnOdice Germany GmbH
Description
KuhnOdice is an expert end-to-end solution provider in passive fire protection, offering technologically advanced materials and systems for various industries including glazing, doors, OEM industrial applications, battery safety, transport and mobility.
Key services
Fire protection materials manufacturing, Fire tests, Individual manufacturing, Tailor-made fire protection boards, Media and downloads
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, WPBakery Page Builder, All in One SEO plugin, UserCentrics (cookie consent), Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Swiper Carousel, hCaptcha
Frameworks
WordPress CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent via UserCentrics
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of hCaptcha for bot protection
  • Google Tag Manager with consent defaults to denied

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Metricool
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Metricool
Marketing tools
Metricool
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with detailed product and service information.
  3. Strong use of structured data and SEO best practices.
  4. Cookie consent implemented with UserCentrics.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage or main navigation.
  6. Contact information includes a phone number and contact form but no direct email addresses visible.
  7. Social media presence is active with LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube links.
  8. Use of modern web technologies and CMS (WordPress).
  9. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3 using WPBakery Page Builder and All in One SEO plugin, indicating a modern and maintainable CMS infrastructure. It uses UserCentrics for GDPR-compliant cookie consent and integrates Google Tag Manager and Metricool for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and fast loading times. Use of hCaptcha enhances bot protection. Hosting appears stable with domain registered via Mesh Digital Limited and DNS managed by domaincontrol.com. No technical debt or deprecated libraries were detected. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and DNS security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kuhnodice.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kuhnodice.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.