Skip to main content

Security report for ktk.it

G.I. Industrial Holding SpA · Manufacturing · Italy

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KTK.it represents the online presence of G.I. Industrial Holding SpA, a well-established multinational manufacturing group specializing in HVAC and industrial cooling solutions. The company leverages four brands to serve commercial and industrial clients with products such as liquid chillers, heat pumps, fan coil units, and packaged rooftop units. The website reflects a mature business with a clear market position and a broad product portfolio targeting B2B customers in the energy and manufacturing sectors. Technically, the website employs a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap, jQuery, FontAwesome, and slick carousel for UI components, ensuring a responsive and user-friendly experience. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though no CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with room for improvement in accessibility and security headers. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and DNSSEC, indicating good baseline security. However, it lacks explicit security headers and published incident response or security policies. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, but no cookie consent mechanism is implemented. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and aligned with the company's business stature. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, implementing cookie consent, and publishing security and incident response policies to improve compliance and trust further.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ktk.it

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
80
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

G.I. Industrial Holding SpA operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on HVAC and industrial cooling solutions. The company benefits from a diversified brand portfolio and a long-standing market presence since the late 1980s. Its business model centers on engineering, manufacturing, and marketing specialized cooling products for commercial and industrial applications. The target customers are businesses requiring HVAC systems, including server rooms and industrial processes. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with subsidiaries and related domains, reinforcing its multinational footprint. Growth indicators include a comprehensive product range and multilingual website support. The company leverages digital marketing tools like Google Analytics and maintains social media presence on LinkedIn and YouTube, supporting brand visibility and customer engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS and DNSSEC enabled, ensuring encrypted communication and domain integrity. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy pages are published, which limits transparency and preparedness communication. Privacy policies are comprehensive and GDPR compliant, but cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which may pose compliance risks. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were found, indicating good maintenance. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but can be improved by implementing recommended headers, consent mechanisms, and incident response disclosures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  2. Deploy a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish explicit security policy and incident response pages to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
G.I. Industrial Holding SpA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
G.I. Industrial Holding SpA
Description
With its 40 years of experience and 4 brands -CLINT, KTK, MONTAIR, NOVAIR- the Multinational Group G.I. Holding manufactures and markets a complete range of solutions for comfort and industrial cooling: air conditioning and air handling systems in commercial or industrial buildings, cooling systems for server rooms and industrial processes.
Key services
Liquid chillers and heat pumps, Fan coil units, Remote condensers and hydronic modules, Packaged rooftop units
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap 4.4.1, jQuery 3.4.1, FontAwesome 5.3.1, Slick Carousel 1.8.1, FancyBox 3.5.7, Popper.js 1.16.0
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • DNSSEC enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear navigation and multilingual support.
  3. No forms detected on the homepage; contact is via email and phone links.
  4. Social media presence includes LinkedIn and YouTube.
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies published on the site.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present but cookie consent mechanism is missing.
  7. Use of modern frontend libraries and frameworks.
  8. No visible signs of suspicious or malicious content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and widely adopted frontend technology stack including Bootstrap 4.4.1, jQuery 3.4.1, FontAwesome 5.3.1, Slick Carousel, and FancyBox for UI and interactive elements. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS or backend platform is detected, suggesting a custom or static site architecture. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of analytics scripts. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site lacks some accessibility features and security headers, which are areas for technical improvement. Overall, the infrastructure supports a professional and functional web presence with opportunities for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ktk.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ktk.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.