Skip to main content

Security report for ksbaw.vip

Other · China

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website ksbaw.vip is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page with no visible content or metadata. This prevents any meaningful analysis of the business, services, or user engagement. The domain is registered since 2017 with a Chinese registrar, but no public business information or contact details are available on the site. The lack of accessible content and security policies indicates a very low digital maturity level. From a security perspective, the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and compliance documentation suggests a weak security posture. Overall, the site presents a high risk due to inaccessibility and lack of transparency, and it is recommended to investigate the cause of the 403 error and implement standard security and compliance measures before public use.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ksbaw.vip

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
50
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the absence of website content, no business intelligence can be derived. The domain registration data indicates a Chinese entity but no further details on market positioning, business model, or services are available. There are no visible partnerships, certifications, or trust indicators. The domain age is moderate but without content, it is not possible to assess growth or competitive advantages.

Security posture

The security posture is poor given the lack of HTTPS enforcement, missing security headers, and no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies. The 403 Forbidden response may indicate server-side access restrictions but does not provide security benefits to end users. No evidence of compliance with GDPR or other frameworks is found. The site is vulnerable to trust issues and may be flagged by users or security tools due to lack of transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve the 403 Forbidden error to allow legitimate user access or provide a clear access restriction message.
  2. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure communications.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  4. Publish contact information and incident response channels to improve trust and security posture.
  5. Deploy security headers and conduct a security audit to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website returns a 403 Forbidden error with minimal HTML content indicating access is blocked or restricted. No specific WAF vendor detected. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
nginx
Performance
moderate
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.
  2. No visible content, metadata, or business information available.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or forms present.
  5. No scripts, analytics, or external links detected.
  6. WHOIS data shows domain is registered and active but no content to verify legitimacy.
  7. Security posture cannot be assessed due to lack of accessible content.
  8. Website likely blocked by server configuration or IP restrictions.
  9. No adult or questionable content detected.
  10. Analysis incomplete due to blocked content.
Technical notes

Notes

The site is hosted on nginx servers managed by Chengdu West Dimension Digital Technology Co., Ltd. No CMS, frameworks, or analytics tools are detected due to lack of content. The minimal HTML returned is a default 403 error page with no metadata or scripts. Performance and SEO cannot be evaluated. The domain uses name servers ns3.myhostadmin.net and ns4.myhostadmin.net. The technical infrastructure appears basic and possibly misconfigured, resulting in blocked access.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ksbaw.vip. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ksbaw.vip.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.