Skip to main content

Security report for krplm.pl

Kancelaria Radców Prawnych Lubieniecki Maciejewski Spółka Partnerska · Other · Poland

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kancelaria Radców Prawnych Lubieniecki Maciejewski is a specialized Polish law firm offering comprehensive legal advisory services primarily focused on public procurement, construction, infrastructure, and modern technologies sectors. The firm provides legal representation in court, administrative proceedings, and before the National Appeal Chamber, targeting business entities and public institutions. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with detailed team profiles and a portfolio of projects, indicating a well-established market position in the legal services domain. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Contact Form 7, LayerSlider, and Google integrations including Analytics and Maps. The site is mobile-optimized with good navigation and SEO practices, though performance is moderate. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and secure forms, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site shows no signs of vulnerabilities or malicious content. However, it could improve by implementing security headers, publishing a security policy, and adding a vulnerability disclosure mechanism. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent banner. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy with consistent registrant information matching the business. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and suitable for its target audience, but could enhance security and privacy compliance to meet higher standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching krplm.pl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The firm operates in the legal services sector with a focus on public procurement and related fields, serving business and public sector clients in Poland. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized expertise and a strong portfolio in infrastructure and technology projects. The business model is service-based, generating revenue through legal consulting and representation. The website indicates active recruitment, suggesting growth. The partnership with kancelariazp.pl hints at a broader network or alliance. The firm maintains a professional online presence with clear contact channels and detailed service descriptions, supporting client acquisition and retention.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and secure contact forms. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency. The use of standard WordPress plugins necessitates regular updates to mitigate vulnerabilities. No exposed sensitive data or suspicious scripts were detected. GDPR compliance is partially addressed via a privacy policy but lacks cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could benefit from enhanced controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to improve protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and preparedness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to reduce vulnerability risks.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Kancelaria Radców Prawnych Lubieniecki Maciejewski Spółka Partnerska
Registration number
0000729722
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kancelaria Radców Prawnych Lubieniecki Maciejewski Spółka Partnerska
Description
Oferuje doradztwo prawne dla podmiotów gospodarczych oraz instytucji publicznych, specjalizując się w rynku zamówień publicznych, budownictwie, infrastrukturze i nowoczesnych technologiach. Zapewnia wszechstronną obsługę prawną, w tym postępowania sądowe, administracyjne oraz przed Krajową Izbą Odwoławczą.
Key services
Doradztwo prawne, Obsługa postępowań sądowych i administracyjnych, Reprezentacja przed Krajową Izbą Odwoławczą, Negocjacje i umowy, Obsługa zamówień publicznych
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Fonts, Google Analytics, Google Maps API, Contact Form 7, LayerSlider, FlexSlider, Fancybox, Video.js
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Secure contact form with CAPTCHA image URL
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Professional legal services website in Polish language
  2. Clear contact information and team presentation
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious content
  4. Uses standard WordPress plugins and technologies
  5. Lacks explicit cookie consent mechanism
  6. No visible security headers in HTML response
  7. Includes Google Analytics and Google Maps integrations
  8. Privacy policy present and linked in footer
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform using widely adopted plugins and libraries such as jQuery, FlexSlider, and Contact Form 7. It integrates Google Fonts, Google Analytics, and Google Maps APIs, indicating a standard web infrastructure. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and structured navigation. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple scripts and sliders. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were observed. Hosting provider details are not explicit. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business needs effectively with room for optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with krplm.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review krplm.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.