Skip to main content

Security report for krpa.cz

KRPA Holding · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KRPA Holding is a traditional Czech manufacturing company specializing in the production of specialized wrapping and graphic papers, envelopes, rolls, business forms, and school supplies. Established since 1835, it maintains a medium-sized presence in the manufacturing sector with several subsidiaries and partner companies. The website reflects a basic but functional digital presence with moderate branding consistency and trust indicators such as FSC certification and cookie consent mechanisms. Technical infrastructure includes legacy technologies like Flash and an outdated jQuery version, alongside modern analytics and retargeting tools integrated with user consent. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and cookie consent but lacks advanced security headers and updated libraries. Privacy compliance is minimal with no explicit privacy or terms of service pages found. Overall, the website is moderately professional and trustworthy but would benefit from modernization and enhanced compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching krpa.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention krpa.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for krpa.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KRPA Holding operates in the manufacturing sector focused on paper products and related office and school supplies. Its market position is that of a long-established Czech company with a diversified product portfolio and multiple subsidiaries. The business model centers on manufacturing and distribution with a target audience of business customers and end users requiring specialized paper products. The company leverages certifications like FSC to enhance market credibility. The website links to several related domains representing subsidiaries, indicating a structured corporate group. Growth indicators include recent news about renewable energy installations and job offers. The company uses standard marketing and analytics tools but lacks visible advanced digital transformation features.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, the presence of outdated jQuery 2.1.0 and legacy Flash content introduces potential vulnerabilities. No advanced security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security or incident response policy, nor vulnerability disclosure information. The absence of explicit privacy and terms of service pages indicates compliance gaps. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires updates and formalization of policies to reduce risk and improve trust.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Remove or replace Flash content with modern HTML5 alternatives to improve security and compatibility.
  3. Implement standard security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to enhance GDPR compliance and user trust.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure program to improve security posture and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KRPA Holding
Description
KRPA Holding - traditional Czech manufacturer of special wrapping and graphic papers, envelopes, rolls, business forms, and school supplies.
Key services
Graphic paper production, Wrapping paper, Business forms and rolls, Office and school supplies, Related services
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.1.0, Google Tag Manager, TermsFeed Cookie Consent, Seznam retargeting script, Flash (legacy banner)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads Conversion Tracking, Seznam Retargeting
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Ads Conversion Tracking, Seznam Retargeting
Marketing tools
TermsFeed Cookie Consent
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS and modern cookie consent mechanisms.
  2. No explicit privacy or terms of service pages found.
  3. Use of legacy Flash content is outdated and may affect security and compatibility.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page.
  5. Multiple related domains for subsidiaries and partner companies are linked.
  6. Google Analytics and retargeting scripts are used with consent mechanism.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present.
  8. FSC certification badge displayed indicating environmental compliance.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or unknown CMS with legacy Flash content and jQuery 2.1.0, indicating some technical debt. Modern technologies include Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and TermsFeed cookie consent scripts. Hosting appears to be Czech-based with domain registration dating back to 1997, consistent with company history. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. The site would benefit from modernization of its tech stack, improved performance optimization, and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with krpa.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review krpa.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.