Skip to main content

Security report for krnap.cz

Správa Krkonošského národního parku · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Správa Krkonošského národního parku operates as the official administrative body responsible for managing the Krkonošský národní park in the Czech Republic. The website serves as a comprehensive resource for visitors, researchers, and the general public, offering information on park regulations, nature conservation efforts, events, and educational programs. The organization positions itself as a government entity focused on environmental protection and sustainable tourism. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, and Swiper.js for interactive content. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes accessibility features, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. However, the absence of CMS identification and hosting details limits deeper technical profiling. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements. While no critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, the lack of explicit security policies and incident response contacts suggests room for improvement in transparency and preparedness. The missing WHOIS data introduces some uncertainty regarding domain registration legitimacy, although the official nature of the content and government affiliations mitigate this concern. Overall, the website presents a trustworthy and professional front for the national park administration, with strong content quality and user experience. Strategic enhancements in security documentation and domain registration transparency would further strengthen its risk posture and stakeholder confidence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching krnap.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates within the government and non-profit sectors, focusing on environmental conservation and public service. Its market position is authoritative as the official national park administration. The business model revolves around providing information, regulatory guidance, and educational outreach rather than commercial revenue generation, although an e-shop is available for related merchandise. The target audience includes park visitors, environmental researchers, and local communities. Partnerships with other Czech environmental agencies and funding from state environmental funds indicate a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators include active event programming and multilingual website support, enhancing accessibility and outreach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforcement and cookie consent compliance. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and advanced security headers limits its maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data is a notable gap, potentially impacting trust from a domain registration perspective. Compliance with GDPR is evident through cookie management and privacy policy presence. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS data to improve domain registration trustworthiness.
  5. Enhance data protection officer visibility and GDPR compliance documentation.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Správa Krkonošského národního parku
Description
Správa Krkonošského národního parku is the official administration body managing the Krkonošský národní park, a national park in the Czech Republic. It provides information and services related to park visitors, nature conservation, park management, events, and educational activities.
Key services
Visitor information and guidance, Nature conservation and monitoring, Educational and volunteer programs, Event organization, E-shop for park-related products
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Seznam API, Swiper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech language with multilingual support.
  3. Strong focus on environmental protection and national park management.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response information.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented and GDPR compliant.
  6. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for a government-related domain.
  7. Social media presence on Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter is active.
  8. No terms of service or vulnerability disclosure policy found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with asynchronous loading of Google Analytics and Tag Manager scripts, improving performance and tracking capabilities. The use of Swiper.js enhances user interaction with sliders and galleries. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility features such as contrast modes and text readability options. SEO is supported by appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is discernible, and no advanced frameworks are explicitly detected. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in resource loading and caching strategies. Overall, the technical implementation supports a stable and user-friendly experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 62/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with krnap.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review krnap.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.