Skip to main content

Security report for krekenavos.lt

Krekenavos agrofirma · Manufacturing · Lithuania

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Krekenavos agrofirma is a well-established Lithuanian meat processing company with nearly 30 years of experience. The company operates a modern meat processing factory compliant with EU standards and offers a variety of meat products and fresh meat. Their business model focuses on manufacturing and distribution within the meat industry, targeting consumers and businesses in Lithuania and potentially broader EU markets. The website reflects a stable and professional business with a significant turnover exceeding 120 million euros in 2020. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Avada theme, incorporating modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slider Revolution. It employs Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized and demonstrates good SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in technical optimization. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks visible security headers and explicit privacy or cookie policies. No forms or sensitive data exposure were detected, indicating a reasonable security posture. However, the absence of incident response contacts, security.txt, and vulnerability disclosure policies suggests areas for enhancement in security governance and compliance. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy, but improvements in privacy compliance, security headers, and transparency around data protection and incident response would strengthen its security posture and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching krekenavos.lt

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Krekenavos agrofirma holds a strong market position in the Lithuanian meat manufacturing sector, leveraging nearly three decades of operational experience and a modern production facility. Their competitive advantage lies in compliance with EU standards, continuous investment in technology, and employee development. The company targets both retail consumers and business clients, offering a diverse product line under multiple brands. Revenue streams are primarily from meat product sales and livestock purchasing. The website's content and social media presence support brand recognition and customer engagement. No direct partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content, indicating a focused business structure. Growth indicators include stable increasing turnover and ongoing investments in production capabilities.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of reputable third-party analytics and marketing tools is noted, but the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response information are provided, which could hinder timely security incident management. GDPR compliance indicators are weak due to missing explicit privacy and cookie policies and consent mechanisms. The absence of a data protection officer contact further highlights compliance gaps. Overall, the security posture is functional but would benefit from enhanced policies, headers, and transparency to meet modern compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  2. Add security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to improve security posture.
  3. Establish and publish a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting and incident response.
  4. Provide clear contact information for a Data Protection Officer or privacy contact to enhance compliance transparency.
  5. Conduct regular security audits of WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Krekenavos agrofirma
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Krekenavos agrofirma
Description
Krekenavos agrofirma is a nearly 30-year-old company operating a modern meat processing factory in Mantvilonių k., Kėdainių rajone, Lithuania. The company focuses on meat processing and offers various meat products. It complies with EU standards and invests in technology and employee competence. The 2020 turnover exceeded 120 million euros.
Key services
Meat processing, Fresh meat supply, Livestock purchasing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, jQuery 3.7.1, Slider Revolution 6.7.31, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Avada Theme, PHP (implied by WordPress)
Frameworks
WordPress, Avada Theme Framework
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Lithuanian language.
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit exceeded.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found in the provided HTML.
  4. Contact information including email, phone, and physical address is clearly presented in the footer.
  5. Website uses modern WordPress CMS with Avada theme and common analytics tools.
  6. No visible security headers detected in the HTML content.
  7. No forms detected in the provided HTML content.
  8. Social media presence includes Facebook and YouTube links.
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  10. No data protection officer contact found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme, supported by common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Slider Revolution for UI components. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for marketing and analytics. The site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data for social sharing. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and asset optimization. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced for better compliance with standards. The lack of visible security headers and privacy mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, limiting infrastructure assessment.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with krekenavos.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review krekenavos.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.