Skip to main content

Security report for kreitl.at

Kreitl GmbH · Other · Austria

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

62/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kreitl GmbH is a small Austrian company specializing in tree care, garden design, and water features, aiming to create natural oases for its clients. The website reflects a local service provider with a clear focus on landscaping and environmental aesthetics. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Avada theme and incorporates modern plugins like Slider Revolution and lazy loading for images, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and includes basic SEO and accessibility features. Security-wise, the website uses HTTPS and has a cookie consent mechanism, but lacks advanced security headers and visible privacy or terms of service policies, which are areas for improvement. Overall, the site is legitimate and consistent with the business's WHOIS registration data, but could enhance its compliance and security posture to build greater trust and meet regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kreitl.at

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
83
Average
62

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the landscaping and garden care sector, targeting residential or commercial clients interested in garden design and tree maintenance. Its market position appears local and specialized, with a business model focused on service delivery rather than product sales. The website content and metadata suggest a well-established business since 2012, with consistent branding and a professional online presence. The absence of detailed contact information and certifications limits the trust signals, but the use of standard web technologies and analytics tools indicates a basic digital marketing strategy. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the domain data.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces its defense-in-depth. No incident response or security policy information is provided, which could hinder rapid response to security events. The absence of vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files suggests limited transparency in security practices. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident reporting.
  4. Establish an incident response plan and publish relevant contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities and maintain security hygiene.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kreitl GmbH
Description
Wir planen, bauen, gestalten und verändern mit Leidenschaft, um Oasen zu schaffen, die Natur für Sie erlebbar machen!
Key services
Baumpflege, Gartengestaltung, Wasserformen
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, CSS, LazyLoad, Slider Revolution
Frameworks
Avada Theme
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
adsimple.at
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a small local business site for landscaping and tree care services in Austria.
  2. Uses WordPress CMS with Avada theme and Slider Revolution plugin.
  3. Includes cookie consent mechanism but lacks visible privacy policy and terms of service pages.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the HTML content.
  5. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enabled.
  6. Includes Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  8. WHOIS data is consistent and supports legitimacy.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Avada theme, a popular and feature-rich framework. It employs modern web technologies including JavaScript lazy loading and the Slider Revolution plugin for dynamic content presentation. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices, with good SEO metadata and structured data in JSON-LD format for enhanced search engine understanding. Performance is moderate, with minified CSS and JS assets indicating some optimization efforts. However, the hosting provider is not explicitly identified, and no advanced CDN or security services like WAF were detected. Accessibility features are basic, and there is room for improvement in semantic markup and ARIA attributes.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kreitl.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kreitl.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.