Skip to main content

Security report for kratc.lt

UAB Klaipėdos regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras · Other · Lithuania

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB Klaipėdos regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras operates as a regional waste management company in Lithuania, providing comprehensive waste collection, sorting, and recycling services to residents and businesses in the Klaipėda region. The company emphasizes environmental sustainability through initiatives like exchange stations for reusable goods and free acceptance of large waste items. Their market position is that of a regional leader in waste management services, supported by ISO certifications that demonstrate commitment to quality and information security. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries and integrates mapping services for user convenience, reflecting a moderate to good digital maturity. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement, use of Google ReCaptcha, and ISO/IEC 27001 certification, although some security headers are not detected and incident response contacts are not explicitly provided. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a clear privacy policy, cookie consent mechanisms, and GDPR adherence. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and user-friendly, though WHOIS data limitations reduce domain trust verification. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response contacts, and improving accessibility features.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kratc.lt

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
90
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention kratc.lt, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
216
Employees
0
Customers
204
Third parties
12
Weak passwords
10%

4 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for kratc.lt.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets both residential and commercial customers within the Klaipėda region, offering waste management contracts, large waste collection points, and recycling facilities. Their business model focuses on service provision with an emphasis on environmental responsibility and community engagement. Revenue streams likely include contract fees from businesses and municipal funding. The company maintains a partnership ecosystem including technology providers and local authorities. Growth indicators include recent relocation of customer service offices and active communication of service updates. The website content and certifications support a credible and established market presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and ISO/IEC 27001 certification indicating formal information security management. Use of Google ReCaptcha on forms helps mitigate spam and automated abuse. However, absence of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No explicit incident response or abuse contact information is provided, which is a gap in security readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Overall, the security culture appears positive but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish clear incident response and abuse contact information on the website to improve security transparency and readiness.
  3. Consider creating and hosting a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with accessibility standards.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB Klaipėdos regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras
VAT number
LT637437415
Registration number
163743744
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB Klaipėdos regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras
Description
UAB Klaipėdos regiono atliekų tvarkymo centras is a waste management company serving Klaipėda region in Lithuania, providing waste collection, sorting, and recycling services including large waste collection points, regional landfill, and exchange stations for reusable items.
Key services
Waste collection points, Large waste acceptance, Recycling and sorting facilities, Exchange stations for reusable goods, Contract management for businesses
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Swiper.js, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Google Translate, Microsoft Bing Maps SDK, Google ReCaptcha, Select2, Plupload
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google ReCaptcha on forms
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • ISO/IEC 27001 certification

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. Strong presence of waste management services and community engagement.
  3. Good compliance with GDPR and cookie regulations.
  4. Use of multiple modern JS libraries and map integration.
  5. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  6. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit exceeded; limits domain trust verification.
  7. No explicit terms of service found.
  8. No incident response or security contact information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, Swiper.js for sliders, AOS for animations, and Select2 for enhanced select boxes. It integrates Google Translate for multilingual support and Microsoft Bing Maps SDK for interactive maps showing waste collection points. The site uses Google ReCaptcha for form protection and Plupload for file uploads. The CMS is not explicitly identified but appears custom or proprietary. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and SEO practices. Accessibility is basic and could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kratc.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kratc.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.