Skip to main content

Security report for krajbezhranic.cz

Krajský úřad Zlínského kraje · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'Kraj bez hranic - Zlínský kraj' serves as an official regional government platform promoting the Zlín Region in the Czech Republic. It highlights local creatives, entrepreneurs, and cultural stories to foster regional identity and economic development. The site targets residents, tourists, and business stakeholders interested in the region's cultural and economic landscape. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript frameworks such as Vue.js and integrates Google Analytics with privacy-conscious settings. Multimedia content and social media integration enhance user engagement. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage and some privacy measures, but lacks explicit security headers and formal privacy/cookie policies. WHOIS data is missing, which slightly reduces domain trust but the official branding and EU funding disclosures support legitimacy. Overall, the site is professional, content-rich, and serves its government promotional purpose effectively.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of krajbezhranic.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching krajbezhranic.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
25
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The site positions itself as a government-backed regional promotion platform, leveraging storytelling and multimedia to showcase local talent and businesses. Its competitive advantage lies in official regional endorsement and cultural authenticity. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on regional branding and cultural promotion funded partly by EU social funds. The target audience includes local citizens, cultural enthusiasts, and potential investors or visitors. The partnership ecosystem includes official social media channels but no commercial partners are explicitly linked. Growth indicators include multimedia content and active social media presence. Strategic observations suggest opportunities to enhance transparency and user trust by adding privacy and security policies.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and Google Analytics is configured to anonymize IPs and avoid client storage, reflecting privacy awareness. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies indicate compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is low risk but could improve by adopting standard security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and providing security contact information.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to ensure no vulnerable libraries are used.
  5. Monitor and resolve the missing WHOIS data issue to improve domain trust and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Krajský úřad Zlínského kraje
Description
The website promotes the Zlínský kraj (Zlín Region) in the Czech Republic, highlighting creative individuals, innovators, and entrepreneurs from the region. It features stories of local personalities and businesses, emphasizing cultural and economic development.
Key services
Regional cultural promotion, Showcasing local entrepreneurs and creatives, Providing media and visual identity resources
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Lottie.js, Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Frameworks
Vue.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Google Analytics configured with anonymize_ip and client_storage:none

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich multimedia content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies explicitly found on the site.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the page.
  4. Social media links point to official regional government accounts.
  5. No forms detected on the page; no user data collection observed.
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data.
  8. Google Analytics is used with privacy-conscious configuration (anonymize IP, no client storage).
  9. Content is professionally presented with consistent branding.
  10. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and reduces domain trust slightly.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript framework (Vue.js) and includes multimedia content such as videos and animations (Lottie.js). Google Analytics is integrated with privacy-conscious settings. The site appears mobile-optimized with responsive design elements. SEO is basic with proper meta tags but could be improved with structured data and accessibility enhancements. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate, likely due to multimedia content. Technical risks include lack of security headers and missing WHOIS data, which could impact trust and security posture.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with krajbezhranic.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review krajbezhranic.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.