Skip to main content

Security report for kraita.io

Circles s.r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

73/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Circles s.r.o., operating under the Kraita brand, provides AI-driven tools aimed at simplifying and automating complex business processes. Their product suite includes cybersecurity management, AI chatbots for customer support, knowledge management assistants, and process automation platforms. The company targets businesses seeking to enhance operational efficiency through modern AI technologies. The website is professionally designed, well-structured, and showcases a clear product portfolio, reflecting a mature digital presence. Technically, the site leverages Webflow CMS, integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, and employs Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though the absence of explicit security headers and a public privacy policy page suggests room for improvement. Overall, the domain appears legitimate with privacy-protected WHOIS data, consistent branding, and no suspicious indicators. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, enhancing security headers, and providing clear contact channels for security incidents.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kraita.io

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
100
Average
73

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kraita positions itself as an innovative technology provider specializing in AI-powered business process tools. Their B2B SaaS model focuses on delivering value through automation, risk analysis, and customer support enhancements. The company’s market positioning leverages AI to differentiate from traditional software providers, targeting SMEs and enterprises aiming to optimize workflows and compliance. The absence of direct contact details on the website may limit immediate customer engagement but aligns with a controlled digital marketing approach. The use of multiple tracking and retargeting services indicates an active marketing strategy. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the domain data. The company’s focus on cybersecurity, knowledge management, and automation aligns with current market demands for digital transformation.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enabled and cookie consent mechanisms in place, reflecting GDPR awareness. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency and preparedness communication. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a technology service provider but could be enhanced by adopting additional HTTP security headers and publishing clear security governance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page detailing data processing and GDPR compliance.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents and data protection inquiries.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and optimize performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Circles s.r.o.
Description
Circles s.r.o. is a technology company behind the Kraita brand, focused on developing innovative digital solutions that help companies improve efficiency, automate processes, and simplify management of key areas. Their technologies facilitate daily operations, save time and costs, and help organizations better manage data and knowledge.
Key services
Kraita Cyber One - Cybersecurity management tool, Kraita Support Assistant - AI chatbot for customer support, Kraita Knowledge Manager - AI knowledge base assistant, Kraita Automation - AI process automation platform
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Webflow CMS, Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Cookiebot Consent Management, JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3
Platforms
Webflow
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and product information
  2. No WHOIS registrant data publicly available, indicating privacy protection
  3. Cookie consent implemented with detailed cookie categories
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on main page
  6. Use of multiple tracking and marketing technologies
  7. Professional branding and consistent messaging
  8. No security headers detected in provided data, opportunity for improvement
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Webflow platform, utilizing modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a mature digital marketing infrastructure. Cookiebot is used for cookie consent management, supporting GDPR compliance. Performance is moderate with responsive design and mobile optimization evident. However, the absence of explicit security headers and limited accessibility features suggest technical debt areas. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but can benefit from enhanced security and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kraita.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kraita.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.