Skip to main content

Security report for kpfilms.com

Klöckner Pentaplast · Manufacturing · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

71/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Klöckner Pentaplast is a global leader in manufacturing sustainable and recyclable plastic films and high-barrier protective packaging, serving sectors such as food, pharmaceutical, health, and durable goods. The company emphasizes sustainability and circular economy principles, with a strong market presence and over 60 years of industry experience. Their website reflects a professional and comprehensive digital presence, showcasing detailed product information, sustainability reports, and corporate governance content. Technically, the site employs modern frameworks like Bootstrap and AngularJS, integrates accessibility tools such as Recite Me, and uses analytics services responsibly with cookie consent mechanisms in place. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and privacy policies, though some security headers and explicit incident response information are absent. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing, which is unusual for a company of this size and history, slightly impacting trust but not undermining the overall legitimacy given the strong branding and external presence. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy, and clarifying domain registration details.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  3. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kpfilms.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
82
Security headers
80
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
73
Average
71

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on sustainable packaging solutions with a global footprint. Their business model centers on innovation in recycled content and high-barrier packaging films, targeting businesses in food, pharmaceutical, and consumer goods industries. The website indicates a mature organization with a large workforce and multiple international plants. Certifications such as APR and TCEP endorsements reinforce their market credibility. The company maintains active engagement through social media and detailed sustainability reporting, signaling a commitment to transparency and corporate responsibility. No direct parent or subsidiary domains were identified, suggesting a standalone brand identity. The digital ecosystem includes marketing and analytics tools that support targeted outreach and user behavior analysis.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism that aligns with GDPR requirements. No sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies represent areas for improvement. The use of third-party scripts such as ZoomInfo and Recite Me should be regularly audited for security risks. The missing WHOIS data raises a minor concern regarding domain registration transparency but does not directly impact website security. Overall, the site is secure for users but could enhance trust by publishing more detailed security governance information.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  3. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  4. Consider publishing a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Clarify domain registration details and ensure WHOIS information is accurate and publicly available to enhance trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Klöckner Pentaplast Group
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Klöckner Pentaplast
Description
Global manufacturer of sustainable and recyclable plastic films and high-barrier protective packaging for Food, Pharmaceutical, Health and Durable products.
Key services
Sustainable rigid and flexible plastic packaging, Pharmaceutical packaging films, Medical device packaging films, Consumer packaging films, Food packaging solutions, Labels and graphics films, Home, building and construction films
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 5.1.3, AngularJS 1.5.0, Video.js 8.16.1, Recite Me assistive technology, ZoomInfo scripts
Frameworks
Bootstrap, AngularJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security and privacy policies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Act-On Software
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Act-On tracking beacon
Marketing tools
ZoomInfo, Recite Me
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design
  2. Strong focus on sustainability and corporate responsibility
  3. Comprehensive legal and privacy documentation present
  4. Multiple social media channels linked and active
  5. Use of modern web technologies and accessibility tools
  6. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms
  7. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and warrants further investigation
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 5.1.3 for responsive design, AngularJS 1.5.0 for dynamic content, and Video.js for media playback. The CMS appears to be PANSITE (TM), a specialized content management system. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and SEO best practices such as meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts and rich media content. There is an opportunity to improve technical robustness by updating AngularJS to a more recent framework version and optimizing script loading. The integration of accessibility tools like Recite Me is a positive indicator of inclusivity. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kpfilms.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kpfilms.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.