Skip to main content

Security report for kpcorp.com

KP Corporation · Government · N/a

Low risk. 2 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KP Corporation is a medium-sized enterprise specializing in large-scale print and digital communication strategies, primarily serving regulated industries such as healthcare, life sciences, government, legal, retail, financial, insurance, and elections. The company offers critical communication, data-driven communication, and commercial print communication services, emphasizing compliance, security, and optimized postal strategies. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and SEO optimization. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates Google Tag Manager and CookieYes for analytics and cookie consent management. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks some security headers and explicit privacy and terms of service pages. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern, reducing trustworthiness and requiring further verification. Overall, the site is functional, professional, and moderately secure but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kpcorp.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
85
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

KP Corporation positions itself as a trusted provider of communication solutions for enterprise clients in highly regulated sectors. Its competitive advantage lies in combining traditional print services with advanced digital technologies and compliance expertise. The business model focuses on SLA-driven, program-based technology solutions that integrate marketing, document management, and supply chain communications. The company targets large enterprises requiring secure, compliant, and efficient communication strategies. The website indicates a mature partnership ecosystem, including LinkedIn presence, and uses modern marketing tools. Growth indicators include a diverse industry focus and comprehensive service offerings. However, the lack of visible contact details and WHOIS data may impact client trust and requires attention.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism that categorizes cookies by purpose. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. There is no public incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which limits transparency and readiness perception. GDPR compliance is partially indicated by cookie consent but lacks a formal privacy policy. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and potential risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing policies, and verifying domain registration.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear and accessible privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Establish and publicize an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to demonstrate security maturity and transparency.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KP Corporation
Description
KP Corporation helps enterprise clients accomplish more with their large-scale print and digital communication strategies and solutions.
Key services
Critical Communication, Data-Driven Communication, Commercial Print Communication
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google Tag Manager, CookieYes Consent Management, Slick Carousel, WordPress
Frameworks
WordPress, Rank Math SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Rank Math SEO, CookieYes
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with detailed cookie categories
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the content
  5. WHOIS data is missing, raising questions about domain registration legitimacy
  6. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  7. No WAF or security blocking detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with integration of modern JavaScript libraries such as Slick Carousel and CookieYes for cookie management. SEO is enhanced using Rank Math plugin, and Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile optimized with responsive design. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. No hosting provider information was detected. The technical stack is modern and supports the business needs, but there is room for improvement in security configurations and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kpcorp.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kpcorp.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.