Skip to main content

Security report for kpaxmarketing.com

KPAX Marketing Online Ltd. · Technology · Cyprus

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

KPAX Marketing Online Ltd. is a small technology-focused marketing and business intelligence service provider with offices in Cyprus and Malta. The company offers a range of services including acquisition and media buying, website design and development, business intelligence consulting, data analysis and reporting, multilingual call center services, and customer support and retention. Their target audience appears to be businesses seeking comprehensive marketing and customer engagement solutions. The website content is basic but functional, with clear navigation and contact information. Technically, the site uses older versions of jQuery and Bootstrap hosted on AWS infrastructure, with Google Maps integration for office locations. However, the site lacks HTTPS implementation and modern security headers, which impacts its security posture negatively. Privacy compliance is minimal, with a basic privacy policy but no cookie consent or GDPR indicators. Overall, the site demonstrates moderate business credibility but requires significant improvements in security and privacy compliance to meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
28/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kpaxmarketing.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
28
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a niche marketing and business intelligence consultancy with multilingual capabilities, targeting businesses that require acquisition strategies, web development, and customer support. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on consulting and operational support. The presence of multiple office locations in Cyprus, Malta, and Bulgaria suggests regional expansion ambitions. The website lacks detailed information on revenue streams or partnerships, and no certifications or trust badges are displayed. The marketing approach includes a Facebook presence but no evident use of advanced analytics or advertising networks. Growth indicators are limited due to minimal content and lack of detailed business disclosures.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low to moderate. The absence of HTTPS is a critical issue that undermines user trust and data security. The use of outdated JavaScript libraries like jQuery 1.9.1 introduces potential vulnerabilities. No advanced security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected. There is no public security policy or incident response contact information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Privacy compliance is weak, with no cookie consent mechanisms or GDPR compliance indicators. The exposure of the Google Maps API key in the source code is a minor risk. Overall, the security posture requires urgent improvements to protect user data and enhance trust.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS site-wide to secure data transmission and improve trust.
  2. Upgrade JavaScript libraries to supported, secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Add comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms aligned with GDPR.
  4. Publish clear security policies and incident response contacts to improve transparency.
  5. Enhance security headers and perform regular security audits to identify and fix vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
KPAX Marketing Online Ltd.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
KPAX Marketing Online Ltd.
Description
KPAX Marketing Online Ltd. offers services including Acquisition & Media Buying, Website Design & Development, Business Intelligence Consulting, Data Analysis & Reporting, Multilingual Call Center, and Customer Support & Retention.
Key services
Acquisition & Media Buying, Website Design & Development, Business Intelligence Consulting, Data Analysis & Reporting, Multilingual Call Center, Customer Support & Retention
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, Bootstrap 3.3.5, Google Maps API
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • No sensitive data exposed in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTP URLs, no HTTPS detected in provided content
  2. No cookie consent or tracking detected
  3. Privacy policy present but basic and no GDPR compliance indicators
  4. No terms of service or security policies found
  5. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical addresses
  6. Use of older JavaScript libraries may pose security risks
  7. Google Maps API key exposed in HTML source
  8. No forms detected in provided HTML content
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using Bootstrap 3.3.5 and jQuery 1.9.1, which are outdated and may pose security and compatibility issues. Hosting is on AWS infrastructure, indicating reliable backend support. Google Maps API is integrated for office location display, but the API key is exposed in the client-side code. The site lacks HTTPS links in the provided HTML, suggesting no SSL/TLS enforcement. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. SEO optimization is poor, with meta tags present but no Open Graph or structured data. The site does not appear to use a CMS, indicating a custom or static site architecture. Overall, modernization and security hardening are recommended to improve technical robustness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kpaxmarketing.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kpaxmarketing.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.