Skip to main content

Security report for kp.pl

Kompania Piwowarska · Manufacturing · Poland

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Kompania Piwowarska is a prominent Polish beer manufacturer operating multiple historic breweries and holding a leading market position in Poland. The company offers a wide portfolio of beer brands, targeting adult consumers with a strong emphasis on quality and tradition. The website reflects a mature digital presence with modern front-end technologies and responsive design, including an age verification gate to comply with alcohol regulations. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS usage and no visible vulnerabilities, though explicit security policies and headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with accessible privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is professional, trustworthy, and well-aligned with the company's business model and market presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching kp.pl

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a dominant position in the Polish beer market with over 35% share, leveraging historic breweries and a diverse brand portfolio. Its business model focuses on manufacturing and distribution of alcoholic beverages, supported by strong marketing and media engagement. The website links to multiple subsidiary brand sites, indicating a well-structured brand ecosystem. The target audience is adult beer consumers, and the company emphasizes sustainability and corporate responsibility. Growth indicators include active media presence and career opportunities. Partnerships with local breweries and sponsorships are evident.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and an age verification mechanism to restrict underage access. However, no explicit security headers or incident response contacts are found, and there is no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file. The absence of exposed sensitive data is positive, but the site could benefit from enhanced security policies and transparency. Compliance with GDPR is indicated by privacy and cookie policies. Overall, security maturity is adequate but could be improved with formalized policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options.
  2. Add a dedicated security policy page and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet higher compliance standards and improve user experience for all users.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Kompania Piwowarska
Description
Kompania Piwowarska is a leading Polish beer company that combines passion and experience with modern technologies to brew high-quality beer appreciated domestically and internationally. It operates three historic breweries: Tyskie Browary Książęce, Lech Browary Wielkopolski, and Browar Dojlidy.
Key services
Beer brewing, Brand marketing, Media and press communications, Sustainability initiatives, Career opportunities
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, Slick Carousel, GLightbox, Swiper.js, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Google Fonts
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • Age verification form to restrict underage access
  • Use of HTTPS implied by URLs (https://www.kp.pl/)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website includes a mandatory age verification gate for alcohol consumption compliance.
  2. Comprehensive product portfolio with detailed beer descriptions and nutritional info links.
  3. Strong brand presence with multiple social media channels linked.
  4. No visible security.txt or explicit security policy pages found.
  5. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible in the HTML content provided.
  6. Privacy and cookie policies are present and accessible via PDF link.
  7. Use of modern front-end libraries and responsive design techniques.
  8. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap, Swiper.js, Slick Carousel, and AOS for animations, ensuring a responsive and visually appealing design. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site loads multimedia content such as videos and images efficiently. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. No CMS or hosting provider details are explicitly detected. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility is basic but present. The technical infrastructure supports a professional and user-friendly experience aligned with business goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with kp.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review kp.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.